04-22-2011, 01:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2011, 01:22 PM by Bring4th_Austin.)
(04-22-2011, 12:15 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: @abridgetoofar
Ra does not say you should not have an emotional response. Ra says there are two ways to express emotional experience. What you are doing is addressing your experiences and applying them in such a way as to achieve acceptance.
Ra never says we should or shouldn't do or have anything. I am referring to what Ra says about a balanced entity. Not all may be striving for balance. I am. Here are Ra's words:
Quote:42.8 Questioner: What is the difference in terms of energy center activation between a person who represses emotional responses to emotionally charged situations and the person who is balanced and, therefore, truly unswayed by emotionally charged situations?
Ra: I am Ra. This query contains an incorrect assumption. To the truly balanced entity no situation would be emotionally charged.
===
Quote:To get all technical (because I'm excited that we may be discussing archetypes soon ;-) ), I will use the exchange between Edinburgh and myself.
My conscious (mind matrix) drew from the unconscious (mind potentiator) in order to read his words (catalyst). I then had these three working in unison creating experience. I experienced many facets at once- stemming from these three. One facet of experience involved the emotion of sadness. I then chose to work with these four together is way to accept it for what it is, and this action led to a form, a significance.
This occured in all; the mind, body, and spirit.
As the body goes, it began with an active vibration (body matrix) which takes form by wisdom (body potentiator) and then interacted with the computer screen (catalyst) and was experienced with the brains natural and acquired reactive responses and then became significant as higher blood pressure and a pit in my stomach.
I know my words didn't convey all the details, because I'm afraid too many words lose interest.
The main purpose is that "emotion" is not the body "feeling" by itself. Emotion is part of experience for mind and body and spirit. Although spirit is mostly a time/space thing and therefore mostly a mystery.
This is a well displayed example, thank you for breaking it down into archetypal significance.
Is your experience of sadness not an emotional charge? Is it not the result of previous biases and beliefs?
Where do you classify these biases and beliefs as far as archetypes go? (Serious question, I'd love to ponder your response.)
You can find the Creator in the sadness you felt. You could also find the Creator in an opposite (happy) reaction to the same catalyst. You can hold on to these emotions, essentially holding on to the biases and beliefs that created them, and still search for, find, and express the Creator. You are very right, emotions exist, and they provide experience.
But if one is striving for balance, emotions are the greatest tool we have. As I said, an STO entity will allow these emotions to flow freely without calculation or contemplation. Raw emotion is the greatest indicator of our imbalances. Using it, we can find these imbalances, and bring ourselves to a neutral emotional state, rather than a charged state, and experience and express life (the Creator) with minimal distortion.
_____________________________
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.