04-21-2011, 11:56 PM
(04-21-2011, 08:58 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Feeling emotional sympathy is not so much due to 4D waves, but rather due to prior experience resonating with unprocessed catalyst. All experience, including those which result in emotional reaction, must be processed with honest evaluation before it can be accepted. Once accepted, that is 'love'. We say we 'feel' love because the feeling-resonance (from already accepted experience) is 'pointing towards' acceptance. We might think we 'recognize' or understand the condition we are resonating with, but we do not yet understand. We can only 'relate' on the level we've managed to integrate. We don't know the difference, yet, between feeling love and 'being' love.
I disagree that we don't know the difference. I find it odd that you state that and then proceed to explain the difference. Honestly, I think you are having a difficult time separating the two as you perceive them in others, or, at the least, read others' accounts of them. I've said this to you before, that I think you underrate 'emotions' as if they are obstacles. Emotions are a valid tool for the m/b/s complex. When I reach a place of acceptance for everything in thought, I feel light. I think a useful exercise would be for you to separate the two by using the word love to describe the commonly referred to emotion and the word light for the love known as acceptance.
(04-21-2011, 08:58 PM)zenmaster Wrote: If love is reduced to a situational emotional reaction, then only a stirring from the unconscious will be seen to be 'loving'.
This statement troubles me. It seems to me that you are doing the "reducing".
Obviously, I'm finding it difficult to see this how you see it.