04-21-2011, 01:42 PM
A proper observation with it's own internal paradox. :-)
but there is no paradox. How could this be? Because the paradox is designed to provide the answer by being the answer. "Q: what is love. A: Exactly"
returning to myself ( rather THIS self of MY self)... I don't think of "love" as what I see and justify. It is moreso a moment of clarity that is unexplainable and not derived from rationalizations. It exists as a thing of itself, IMO, as each of the 22 archetypes is a thing of itself.
but there is no paradox. How could this be? Because the paradox is designed to provide the answer by being the answer. "Q: what is love. A: Exactly"
returning to myself ( rather THIS self of MY self)... I don't think of "love" as what I see and justify. It is moreso a moment of clarity that is unexplainable and not derived from rationalizations. It exists as a thing of itself, IMO, as each of the 22 archetypes is a thing of itself.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bf3f/1bf3fbd0afaa7441d659111363cd0016e52d1ef8" alt="Smile Smile"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a735d/a735d794b82171ab9812a64861bf115a8997bae5" alt="Heart Heart"