04-10-2011, 11:27 AM
(04-10-2011, 11:11 AM)3DMonkey Wrote:Which part? Is certainty some kind of requirement?(04-10-2011, 10:18 AM)unity100 Wrote:(04-10-2011, 08:40 AM)Eddie Wrote: Well put; succinct explanation.
it isnt a correct explanation. a 2d entity is not something planet creates. it is an entity that is part of a group soul, and the entity is in 2d.
ra had said that spirit complex always exists from beginning of time. this includes 1d entities. 'enspiriting' at the end of 2d is only in appearance than in reality.
Unity100, we both know that neither of us has the knowledge nor the understanding of these matters to declare any of this correct or incorrect.
My post does not describe the planet creating an entity. It is a description of our general 3D perspective on this 3D plane.
You can disagree with anything you choose. Correctness on these matters isn't afforded any 3D entity.
I said smilingly
(04-10-2011, 11:08 AM)zenmaster Wrote:(03-18-2011, 01:41 AM)hogey11 Wrote: One of the most descriptive thing that Ra mentions about these entities with 3D/4D bodies is that they are rich in compassion; in other words, they are partially 4D (density of love), just as our pets are partially 3D (self-aware animals).Not sure I understand the analogy. The 'dual-activated' entities have already been harvested, while pets have not. Also 'dual-activated' entities are not partially 4D, they are fully 4D. They have the potential to 'appreciate' full 4D 'light', while pets (or any 2D lifeform) do not have the potential to appreciate 3D 'light'.
How do you know this with certainty?