03-28-2011, 11:47 PM
I love discussing this matter. I side with unity100 more or less. I love discussing it with hogey11 because you are terrific at agreeing to disagree.
I do think it is semantics. I think the discrepancy is how "zoomed in" we are at looking at the details. Zoom in and death is quite necessary. Zoom out and it all flows unnoticed.
If it is gradual, then what do we suppose is the process of all the unharvestables that will be relocating? Does a gradualistic idea have an earth where only 4D positive harvestables are existing in dual bodies, whilst the 4D negs and the 3Ds Unharvestables are gone?
At some point they must leave.
I do think it is semantics. I think the discrepancy is how "zoomed in" we are at looking at the details. Zoom in and death is quite necessary. Zoom out and it all flows unnoticed.
If it is gradual, then what do we suppose is the process of all the unharvestables that will be relocating? Does a gradualistic idea have an earth where only 4D positive harvestables are existing in dual bodies, whilst the 4D negs and the 3Ds Unharvestables are gone?
At some point they must leave.