Is Non-Polarity a Choice for 6th-Density Wanderer?

[Vanguardian]

Got it, thanks aWanderer91. It is confusing language to have the word harvest with only one density attached to it. Perhaps it is a best practice to have two densities labeled in a harvest - the old one and the new one, or at least words like "into" or "from." It is possible/probable that the question you mentioned is about sixth to seventh density as well since it mentions compassion blended with wisdom in the past tense, and the previous question appears to indicate that they can graduate into sixth density without a social memory complex.

43.14... This is correct although in fifth density entities may choose to learn as a social memory complex or as mind/body/spirit complexes and may graduate to sixth density under these conditions, for the wisdom density is an extremely free density whereas the lessons of compassion leading to wisdom necessarily have to do with other-selves.

https://www.lawofone.info/s/43#14

Although, this is all very complex for us to understand from a third/fourth density mindset and also represent with human language. It just makes sense to me that the reason the higher self looks backward to help their past selves is because they cannot progress until the past selves progress. It may also provide some understanding of why the veil was created and why the speeding up of evolution was an important goal. But it is just a guess yet to be revealed in the distant future. At least the concept of serving past selves and seeking to become the mind/body/spirit complex totality gives us some insight into the polarity of sixth density and what is required to graduate to seventh.

Hey MonadicSpectrum, thx for the in-depth reply. Some notes:

• I recall reading something about higher selves being the gift from 7th density to 6th density (37.6), which then can be used as a "future" (simultaneous) self (70.9) to us here in 3D, functionally more of a guide than can advise and protect "when able" so not all situations (not to violate free will). 
  I'm not sure how to add in-line citations, but check out 36.1-15ish and 70.6-14.  
  
• Awesome name lol 
  
• I second the "into-from" nomenclature