12-12-2021, 08:39 PM
(12-12-2021, 04:23 PM)IndigoSalvia Wrote: The clear demarcations between STO/STS, as well as other seeming opposite/complementary natures have been dissolving for me: Creator/Creation; separation/unity; self/other; teach/learn; time/space; what is/what is not ...
I have a clear sense that there is a state of both separation and unity, simultaneously. But, it feels like my 3D brain is programmed to see (choose) either unity or separation. I can't quite seem to hold the two occurring simultaneously.
Like a coin: the coin is one thing, and it also has 2 sides. Is it a 2-sided thing? Is it 1 thing? Or is it both/and? It's both/and.
I read the latest Quo channeling (https://www.llresearch.org/channeling/2021/1105), and the boundaries between the poles, etc. dissolved a bit more.
I understood that the poles (STO and STS) are illusory. And, paradoxically, within the 3D illusion, it is necessary to choose and thus, reinforce seeming separation. In my 3D experience, I find that choice is unavoidable and instinctual for me.
So, I have the experience of holding two 'realms' or 'truths' that feel paradoxical. Like I'm walking and being in 3D, but I can catch a glimpse of another truth or realm where all is both/and simultaneously (where the demarcations between separation and unity dissolve).
I've started practicing seeing that each moment has infinite choices (for feeling, acting, thinking, etc.) What, out of this buffet, do I choose? Can I possibly choose both unity and separation at the exact same time?
It's a weird sensation, and I'm not sure whether the words I have chosen capture it. Maybe it's just semantics, but something is drawing me to it.
Comments from others who have 'been there, done that'?
It's all paradoxical and misleading at the 3d level, this is why it's important to not view things as inherently positively or negatively polarizing, but model your actions in respect to your internal morals/intent, to act ethically (external, karma creating) through your morals (internal, polarization direction). The trick is keeping action and intent polarities in sync, otherwise you get stuck in confusion.
Some things may seem to be separating when they are not, and vice versa, depending on the level of wisdom it is viewed from. But the ultimate goal is to polarize without worrying about it.