Are you going to take the vaccine?

[Dtris]

Actually a question on ones perspective just occurred to me:

Q1: Does anyone believe that not getting vaccinated poses a real threat to other people, and therefore is an infringement on other people's free will?

Q2: if yes to Q1, does one believe that those not vaccinated should in turn be controlled to mitigate the premise set in Q1?

Q1: Being unvaccinated for any disease can never in and of itself be a threat. Having an illness and passing it on can be a threat.

This would also not be an infringement on another free will unless you intentionally spread the disease.

Q2: The presence of a threat does not ever act as a moral justification for control, outside of special circumstances involving care for those you are entrusted to care for, like children.

The entire premise of this question is actually a good example of how insidious the present discussions regarding society have been. Specifically in regards to things being "rights" which cannot be rights, due to infringing on the freedom of others. This is most pronounced in the "health care is a right" movement. You cannot have a right to someone else's labor or property, yet this is what is being argued, and when pressed they make up a new class of rights.

Safety is not a right. Safety cannot be guaranteed. No one else is responsible for your safety. These simple truths have been hidden by the relative safety of modern society.

Concurrent with this, people do not understand the importance of freedom, or free will.

[/url]

71.14 Questioner: You have made the statement that pure negativity acts as a gravity well pulling all into it. I was wondering first if pure positivity has precisely the same effect? Could you answer that please?
Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. Positivity has a much weaker effect due to the strong element of recognition of free will in any positivity approaching purity. Thus although the negatively oriented entity may find it difficult to polarize negatively in the midst of such resounding harmony it will not find it impossible.

Upon the other hand, the negative polarization is one which does not accept the concept of the free will of other-selves. Thusly in a social complex whose negativity approaches purity the pull upon other-selves is constant. A positively oriented entity in such a situation would desire for other-selves to have their free will and thusly would find itself removed from its ability to exercise its own free will, for the free will of negatively oriented entities is bent upon conquest.

Notice the first instance of the word Free. Any STO polarization which approaches purity will have a strong element of recognition of free will. This means that respecting the free will of others is one of the primary characteristics of STO polarization.

[url=https://www.lawofone.info/s/15]15.21 Questioner: Well, in yesterday’s material you stated “we offer the Law of One, the solving of paradoxes.” You also mentioned earlier that the first paradox, or the first distortion I meant, was the distortion of free will. Could you tell me if there’s a sequence? Is there a first, second, third, fourth distortion of the Law of One?

Ra: I am Ra. Only up to a very short point. After this point, the many-ness of distortions are equal one to another. The first distortion, free will, finds focus. This is the second distortion known to you as Logos, the Creative Principle or Love. This intelligent energy thus creates a distortion known as Light. From these three distortions come many, many hierarchies of distortions, each having its own paradoxes to be synthesized, no one being more important than another.

The first distortion of Intelligent Infinity is Free Will. When free will finds focus, then we have the creation of Logos. Logos is they equated with the Creative Principle and Love. While many here seem focused heavily on love, which is certainly natural, Free Will is what creates and is the necessary part of love. Love cannot exist without free will.

If you look at the behavior of all the authorities involved in this show, what is the common theme?