Law of One and Fundamentalism

[Ming the Merciful]

Brandon, I agree with you one hundred percent. I have had your argument since I joined Law of One. Within a few days of joining, I sensed an "Evangelical" undertone in the background. If the spirit of the Law of One is, (supposedly), all-encompassing and all-pervasive, then it cannot become the, (typical), "Fundamentalist" attitude, that only our way is the best, and all others are inferior. I have studied Religion from Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikh, Sufi and others, and the weakness of all of them. Only our beliefs are correct, and all others are imposters. There is an underlying sense of superiority within the Law of One, and I have argued against it from the beginning. As for my own beliefs, I accept everything, and deny everything. Or, in other words, the only way to reach Enlightenment, is to find your own Path. Religion and Spirituality is too often a stumbling block, and not a step upwards. 

The "Law of One" is not an absolute. Or, it is only one of many organizations that are teaching the same core beliefs. Since I encountered the Law of One, I have encountered two other organizations with the same goals, and attempting to unite Humanity. I consider them on the same level as the "Law of One", and I will put none on a pedestal and say it is better. They are all equal. The Law of One does have the problem of putting itself onto a pedestal, and that could become its downfall. In accepting and understanding the "Great Knowledge", there must also be humility. We must drop the pretense of superiority and evangelism. Everything has its place, and become part of the "Overall Whole". Unity through Diversity. Good one Brandon, lets have a proper discussion about this?