Choosing polarities, survey/discussion.

[jafar]

As someone that does clinical work, I would like to share some insights from my experience in this field when clients/patients/participants provides the "I am all, exploring 'all' experiences" answers to our 1st person perspective questions.  

I was applying for a role in Financial Crime Unit, during an interview we had this kind of discussion.

A: I have experience on detecting fraud, I know the pattern, the indication and can follow through to find evidence for a fraud.
B: Have you performed the fraud yourself?
A: No I haven't.
B: I'm sorry, you're not the one we are looking for, for this specific role we're looking for those who has hands on experience on performing fraud.

The interview gives a lot of afterthought, and gradually I begin to accept that the rejection makes perfect sense.
I know only the what and how but never experience it myself, thus I missed out on the WHY aspect.

In order to fully grasped the WHY aspect, one need to experience it themselves...

This topic is extensive, and I advise looking into Carl Jung's work if anyone are interested.

By referencing to Jung's model of:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cd/bf/26/...460caa.png

Then the "Infinite Creator" is the white background an endless infinite white background.

A hypothetical conversation between a 'psychiatrist' and infinite creator will be something like this:

P: I have concluded your case, it seems you are suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder.
IC: I couldn't agree more, although I wouldn't call it as 'suffering' and definitely it is not a disorder, as it's actually the order of things, one among my personality is YOU, so I also fully understand on WHY you have that opinion.

Since before time and space were,
the Tao is.
It is beyond is and is not.
How do I know this is true?
I look inside myself and see.
-- Lao Tse