jafar,
Thank you for the comment and thorough explanation,
It is wonderful for you to share the philosophy of the Law of One, and try your best to maintain a philosophical "fluidity" in the questionnaires.
As someone that does clinical work, I would like to share some insights from my experience in this field when clients/patients/participants provides the "I am all, exploring 'all' experiences" answers to our 1st person perspective questions.
(please excuse my analogy)
In criminology, we have statistical evidence of spiritual, religious, and dogmatic "people/practitioners" carrying out morally morbid actions (Not saying you are.) with similar "philosophy" mentioned above as their psychological bypass for any "humanly" unacceptable behaviors.
Hence, the survey is "direct" and focuses on the core perspective/experiences of the participants from their 1st pov, not so much on what they "believe" in as that is something they "picked up" from a teaching/books they have read in their adulthood, or indoctrinated into. Children on the other hand, are "pure" in this sense. And they are easier for us to detect innate or "born-personality/psychology."
For your curiosity, that research was to understand if sociopath and psychopathic behaviors are "natural" or "learned" (nature vs nurture.)
Please keep in mind, this has nothing to do with what I am doing here, the questionnaires/discussion I facilitated here is to further the understand of the Law of One, and people like ourselves that read the materials.
Interestingly, a common pattern of answering does surface frequently when similar survey are being done.
On one end of the spectrum, we tend to see participants start doing what we call... "channeling" god into their answers, which in a way mask their 1st person pov on sensitive subject like "what do you think about murder? would you ever consider it?" etc. etc.
On the other end of the spectrum, we see extremely vague answers from some participants, and when we ask them further, we are met with passive disgruntle attitude towards the facilitator/research. These group of participant also mask their 1st pov from a place of discernment and with intention to reject, disapprove, and minimize the effectiveness of the survey.
Both results/outcome provides a correlation that there is a level of disintegration of the shadow-self. This topic is extensive, and I advise looking into Carl Jung's work if anyone are interested.
Aside from the clinical explanation above, the questionnaires are neutral and with the intention to have the "self" introspect their "core-nature" with the least amount of "distortions" as possible.
The Law of One material is a form of distortion of it's own, as it gives reader a sense of righteous "altruism" or polar opposite attitude/view/understanding of human existence.
Some may call this a "echo chamber" or co-dependent affirmation.
One of many antidote to this is to bring the person back to just being... "human" through their own dialogues, and retrospection. Because that is essentially what you 'are' currently, and undeniably.
I hope this gives some insight/understanding to you jafar and others.
Your answers and explanation was insightful and it is correct, so please do not feel that my response is in anyway "disagreeing" with your view/answers.
All answers are correct, and I am only providing my own insight as the facilitator.
with l/l
Thank you for the comment and thorough explanation,
It is wonderful for you to share the philosophy of the Law of One, and try your best to maintain a philosophical "fluidity" in the questionnaires.
As someone that does clinical work, I would like to share some insights from my experience in this field when clients/patients/participants provides the "I am all, exploring 'all' experiences" answers to our 1st person perspective questions.
(please excuse my analogy)
In criminology, we have statistical evidence of spiritual, religious, and dogmatic "people/practitioners" carrying out morally morbid actions (Not saying you are.) with similar "philosophy" mentioned above as their psychological bypass for any "humanly" unacceptable behaviors.
Hence, the survey is "direct" and focuses on the core perspective/experiences of the participants from their 1st pov, not so much on what they "believe" in as that is something they "picked up" from a teaching/books they have read in their adulthood, or indoctrinated into. Children on the other hand, are "pure" in this sense. And they are easier for us to detect innate or "born-personality/psychology."
For your curiosity, that research was to understand if sociopath and psychopathic behaviors are "natural" or "learned" (nature vs nurture.)
Please keep in mind, this has nothing to do with what I am doing here, the questionnaires/discussion I facilitated here is to further the understand of the Law of One, and people like ourselves that read the materials.
Interestingly, a common pattern of answering does surface frequently when similar survey are being done.
On one end of the spectrum, we tend to see participants start doing what we call... "channeling" god into their answers, which in a way mask their 1st person pov on sensitive subject like "what do you think about murder? would you ever consider it?" etc. etc.
On the other end of the spectrum, we see extremely vague answers from some participants, and when we ask them further, we are met with passive disgruntle attitude towards the facilitator/research. These group of participant also mask their 1st pov from a place of discernment and with intention to reject, disapprove, and minimize the effectiveness of the survey.
Both results/outcome provides a correlation that there is a level of disintegration of the shadow-self. This topic is extensive, and I advise looking into Carl Jung's work if anyone are interested.
Aside from the clinical explanation above, the questionnaires are neutral and with the intention to have the "self" introspect their "core-nature" with the least amount of "distortions" as possible.
The Law of One material is a form of distortion of it's own, as it gives reader a sense of righteous "altruism" or polar opposite attitude/view/understanding of human existence.
Some may call this a "echo chamber" or co-dependent affirmation.
One of many antidote to this is to bring the person back to just being... "human" through their own dialogues, and retrospection. Because that is essentially what you 'are' currently, and undeniably.
I hope this gives some insight/understanding to you jafar and others.
Your answers and explanation was insightful and it is correct, so please do not feel that my response is in anyway "disagreeing" with your view/answers.
All answers are correct, and I am only providing my own insight as the facilitator.
with l/l
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)