08-07-2021, 06:47 PM
(08-07-2021, 05:48 PM)Ming the Merciful Wrote:While I have a tendancy to agree with you I just do not completely see it this way. I think (think) there are some that are to be in silence most of the time and others to be in action for a balanced portion of time. Being in silence is good for that one as he heals the collective of humanity while the other is working with the incarnated people so to speak. Both paths are beneficial for the whole of humanity.(08-07-2021, 03:01 PM)Patrick Wrote: I believe it is possible to participate without being pulled in the maelstrom. Although, that is much harder to do than just observing.
It all depends where you want to draw the line? Obviously in this lifetime you have recognized your Spiritual potential, or you wouldn't be investigating such things as the "Law of One", or similar beliefs? The Path of non-violence and non-participation, and rejecting anything that is morally wrong. At the current time we are living in immoral times. It is better to remain the "Silent Majority", in service by "No Action". We must lead by example and not be a follower. Somebody alone in peace generates a presence far beyond where they are living, and that can only generate positive attitudes.
Some of the humans that suffer need healing through touch, the spoken word or physical presence. The collective needs the healing in thought forms, the refreshing peace and calm and the rational. So I think both are healing. What do you think? I would not trade my life in being of physical service to humans, plant and animal. It is what I have come to do and I love it. I grow each time I can witness the exchange between who I consider me and the other. (even if it seems a little abrasive, I am learning more and more about myself and "You" in which I happen to love also but on the deepest level bc I see you as the One).