(08-03-2021, 12:59 PM)Patrick Wrote: I just mean to say that tech is not the issue. It's how it is used. But humanity as a whole wishes tech to be for the good and I believe this will make it so. The Internet has been very good to us, no matter all the nefarious intent it was supposed to be used for.
While I like tech, Ra did point out that it is much less efficient as a tool of evolution. I really wish natural healing would work better. All that is needed for it is the law of squares. Just more people believing that it works well and it will.
I think the push against vaccination is detrimental to convincing people that natural healing is better.
Why not let the vaccine fail. Then demonstrate that natural medicine works better against this disease.
People will be more likely to change if it is done by example.
.
I might suggest taking a closer look at humanity.
The larger action, or wish, I would say is a good deal more toward not wanting to be inconvenienced than it is that the injections be beneficial. The masses have moved near blindly toward the injections, having done very little research into them themselves *relative to the depth of research that is possible. For the most part more simply following the media narrative(s) and subliminal messaging. This in itself will have the effect that it will.
We have to see that there is more to "technology" than the mere word.. there are many ways this concept may beneficially be subdivided to aid in further understanding. There is, for instance "clean" and "dirty" technology. As a species we are not moving forward with clean technology. We are moving forward with technology that finds its basis in greed, fame, fortune, etc.. at the expense of real lives. If we were to separate all this from the injection campaign we would see it stop instantaneously. Which would be good, as then others with cleaner technologies would come to the fore.
The push "against" is more against abuse of power ( mandates ) against "dirty" technology, as well as the negative, unnecessary use of it.
It is not that either AI and/or Natural means are, or can be made to function, one better than the other.
It is that each exists, each is a choice, - and neither is, fundamentally, therefore should not be pitted against the other.
This is not a complimentary use of the basic ability to choose.
Each one is where they are in their evolution.
.