Qestion for LOO scholars....

[Eddie]

I've been wondering a lot, lately, why Ra makes so little mention of the sages of the East (Padmasambhava, Babaji, Yukteswar, ad infinitum.....)...

I believe this was done on purpose. I am glad Ra did not use too much of the spiritual language of the East or those names. I don't know why exactly but I have zero resonance with that stuff and am even a bit pushed back by it. It is completely non sensical to me. It just brings so much distortions into what I have clearly understood from Ra.

So my guess is that they wanted to bring a different slant on that same information. Using a language that people like me could finally get behind and relate to.

My reaction has been the opposite; I am profoundly moved (and enriched) by the study of Eastern teachings; and I find most of them quite resonant with LOO.