Comparing Ra and the Cassiopaeans

[Sena]

You bring up Icke and Wilcock. I think you are making an error in attributing the missteps of these public figures to negative influence. While that is a possibility, it is much more likely that these fellow flawed humans have their own biases and errors which they make. Wilcock personally led me to the Ra material and I have a huge amount of respect for him and his work, even if there are portions I personally disagree with.

As for Wilcock, I feel the same way, and has done a tremendous service, the point was that he admits to "falling for" some premises given to him, and the risk was (is) his legacy/teachings, and the potential collapse is something everyone should learn from. He gets alot of undeserved flak IMO, and I appreciate the situation he's in is fraught with pitfalls. I do believe the more light you try to shine, the more undesirable attention one may get. It's a part of the game here.

Zedro, I agree with you about David Wilcock. I won't take any book as Gospel truth, but I find his books interesting, and they are consistent with the Law of One. There does seem to be a group of people who hate Wilcock; their hatred needs to be analyzed.