Comparing Ra and the Cassiopaeans

[Asolsutsesvyl]

My understanding is that the octave works the same as the music scale. We can hear multiple octaves of sound, but the notes repeat. This major octave is still one in an infinite cycle. The 8th note is also the first. So an 8D entity in our octave is a 1st density in the next. In the concept of densities we might be able to assume that the individuated portions of the creator continue their evolution thru the densities and that the higher densities can interact with the lower.

It is possible that we are interacting with a lower octave than our own in some ways, such as experiments with sub-atomic particles.

There's a larger range of interpretations discussed of the Ra cosmology than of the Cassiopaean cosmology, because the formulation is left rather open-ended. I've noticed that most people here that describe a structure of the cosmos in terms of densities reduce the cosmology to a subset of possible ideas. I'm no exception in that regard. I'll try to describe the main criteria I use, or the overall angle in what differs.

The cosmology somehow ranges from the unity of the creator to the greatest complexity of division. How can it all fit together in one "something"? If unity is not reached when 7D is entered, then where else, is it after X octaves, or after an infinite number of octaves? If individual beings still exist around 7D, then you have a different scale than the one I try to picture.

In the Cassiopaean cosmology, the attempt is made to fit "everything" (or a somewhat simplified view thereof) into a scale of 7. The density scale becomes a gradient ranging from perfect fullness (7D, all alive as one) to perfect emptiness (that which is merely thoughts in the mind of, perhaps, the logos, and which lead a purely virtual existence). I still use that basic frame of reference.

What's the use of several octaves if nothing can truly be bigger than 7D? It comes mainly from zooming in, as is done in the Ra cosmology, and considering smaller octaves. For example, when you divide each density into 7 steps, and you count from step 1 in 3D, then step 8 is the first step in 4D. And if subatomic particles are lower than atomic ones, then you'd presumably find them by zooming in on the lower end of 1D.