05-24-2021, 02:32 PM
(05-24-2021, 10:38 AM)Diana Wrote: So I do think someone polarizing negatively, and especially an adept, can be cognizant of the truth, and still choose to follow the chosen path anyway. The entity who does so may be fulfilling the exploration of that which is not, which according to Ra as I understand it, is still a service to creation.
Agree..
There are many reasons why an entity choose to walk the 'not' path.
Some might be because they don't know that it is the 'not' path, and thinking that it is the 'is' path.
Some others because they do know that it is the 'not' path thus also well aware of what is the 'is' path.
The other "elite insider" theme material, labeled as "Hidden Hand" seem to know that he / they are indeed walking the 'not' path.
https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_socie...and_081018
And I remember that Ra did mentioned during their 3rd density era, there are 'visitors' from 5th density positive who incarnated as 3rd density negative on planet Venus and harvested as 4th density negative.
The 'not' does help one understanding about the 'is' as it provides a contrast.
Another common theme between Ra/Quo, Hidden Hand and this material that I detect is, they seem to be in agreement that an SMC/Soul Group called Yahweh (or as Ra/Quo mentioned, the 2nd Yahweh) are among those who did not realized that they're walking the 'not' path. By citing the "Ten Commandments" which contain the "Not" restrictions as a 'clue' and 'indicator'.
From: https://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/i..._0121.aspx
K: The Ten Commandments were given by the second, negative Yahweh? Is that correct?
I am Q'uo and am aware of your query, my brother. This is basically correct, for these commandments were seen as the pillars upon which would rest the many laws that would protect and guide the chosen people in a manner that was in accordance with the desires of the Orion-based Yahweh. These commandments included previous concepts given by the first Yahweh contact and then there was added unto those concepts a turning or twisting toward the negative orientation so that the commandments were, shall we say, then restrictions upon entities more than inspiration to affirmative or positive action and imaging of concepts. Is there a further query, my brother?