"and it is an organization which is deliberately and exclusively polarized STO"
As others have noted, the org is very 3d. So it is not harvestable or even close.
Certain individuals are on the spiritual path such as old timer Jim.
Percentage wise, they might be positive a third of the time. Or even less. Humans have good days and bad days yes.
"begin to detune the host organization. "
The last time the counsel of 7 tried to retune things it ended up the counsel of 6 and the mistakes were rectified. The mistake was attempting to fix something that was unasked for.
While this thread is not specifically about dark subjects, leafie is active enough in other threads for people to get that he is not asking to know what is going on but go away with the dark stuff. So when somebody said conspiracies helped raise consciousness, this was counter challenged by spaced. Using a quo quote answering a question about conspiracies.
I pointed out the contradictions already.
"Do you think we have any duty/responsibility to keep this place clean, so to speak, while we're using it? I think that's reasonable, but naturally, defining "clean" will require much discussion."
Yes but it would help not to make a mess of things while trying.
Until the counsel decides on a new revised or better explained forum rule guideline, it would help to read the current pages. And if you think there is a mess, just post the link or relevant portions.
What i see happen is that in trying to fix issues, people have personal biases. Posting the forum rule removes much of that. And it will help prevent people from violating more rules fixing other rules. Potentially infringing on people s right to know by declaring your right not to know. Creating separation by justifying it as fixing detunement. This is not complicated stuff.
If you had a job, you had work place rules to follow.
As others have noted, the org is very 3d. So it is not harvestable or even close.
Certain individuals are on the spiritual path such as old timer Jim.
Percentage wise, they might be positive a third of the time. Or even less. Humans have good days and bad days yes.
"begin to detune the host organization. "
The last time the counsel of 7 tried to retune things it ended up the counsel of 6 and the mistakes were rectified. The mistake was attempting to fix something that was unasked for.
While this thread is not specifically about dark subjects, leafie is active enough in other threads for people to get that he is not asking to know what is going on but go away with the dark stuff. So when somebody said conspiracies helped raise consciousness, this was counter challenged by spaced. Using a quo quote answering a question about conspiracies.
I pointed out the contradictions already.
"Do you think we have any duty/responsibility to keep this place clean, so to speak, while we're using it? I think that's reasonable, but naturally, defining "clean" will require much discussion."
Yes but it would help not to make a mess of things while trying.
Until the counsel decides on a new revised or better explained forum rule guideline, it would help to read the current pages. And if you think there is a mess, just post the link or relevant portions.
What i see happen is that in trying to fix issues, people have personal biases. Posting the forum rule removes much of that. And it will help prevent people from violating more rules fixing other rules. Potentially infringing on people s right to know by declaring your right not to know. Creating separation by justifying it as fixing detunement. This is not complicated stuff.
If you had a job, you had work place rules to follow.