Are you going to take the vaccine?

[LeiwoUnion]

I get the reasoning behind the question of what happens with the broken down strands.  Here is an article that made it clearer for me.

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/ar...eir-lipids

This is all fine and dandy scientific sales pitch material which takes into account only the things that have been 'verified' (this makes me laugh these days) by experiments. There's always unknowns left, of course, and they never get publicised, nor focused, because those mean losing future grants; it is imperative that the outlook is always forward, outreaching. The huge problem about scientific experiments (which explain many odd results in my past on hindsight) is that scientists assume absolute objectivity. Even by sciences own materialistic standards the results from experiments rarely close in significant objectivity. This is usually 'remedied' by increasing 'the n' aka the number of parallel/repeated experiments, or just with plain ignorance. However, usually in the prototyping stage everything is done in smaller scale where 'the subjective effect' from one person has larger effect on the final results. This bias of a certain result is then carried further in the chain of experiments until they either remain in the final product or fail at some point as the bias is discarded for whatever reason. For scientists doing these experiments nothing is Mind, when everything is Mind. When they say they close in absolute objectivity, they are near absolute subjectivity, because everything is subjective. This fundamental bias could be used productively (known as magic) but it will never be accepted by those entrenched in materialistic doctrine of scientism (who control almost all of what gets published). So, because of this fundamental flaw in the scientific machine, expect no real understanding from them of deeper meanings of how even their precious material world works. They are merely grasping in the dark going for the thing producing most prestige to those holding the strings. The publications are collections of sanitized results which work until they don't, and media articles and interviews of scientists and professors are sales pitches. It is a world where blind leads the blind.

At least one can believe that the vaccine helps them and their closed one's, so then it perhaps may do just that. That is a very materialistic outlook, however, and when all things are considered (e.g. the things said above) extremely illusory.

This is only my opinion, so take it as such.