Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material female wanderers

    Thread: female wanderers


    Louisabell (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 1,168
    Threads: 30
    Joined: Nov 2017
    #30
    05-06-2020, 11:07 PM
    (05-06-2020, 10:16 PM)Glow Wrote: You are reducing what I am saying.

    And you're reading into what I'm saying. Who said that women don't go on hero journeys? I'm talking about just a small aspect of life. No, the totality of a woman's life is not based on superficial courtships in her youth. Does it even need to be said?

    (05-06-2020, 10:16 PM)Glow Wrote: Sure there could be a princess archetype but to claim the hero’s journey is male is rediculous. Even the originator himself said “it is found in every great storey ever told. Not every great male storey, every great storey.

    He said the hero journey decribed male initiation into manhood. So what? Where did he say women can't go on hero journeys? Like every story of transformation can be made to fit into the hero's journey. So are women just not allowed to transform ever, except when told by men?

    Who honestly thinks that!? You must think we're all drooling 2-dimensional idiots with bigotry for brains.

    And you know what, who a woman chooses to have a child with is EXTREMELY important, to her happiness, the child's happiness and even society as a whole. The fall from vanity/pride to humbleness/modesty is very important in a general sense for women AND men.

    (05-06-2020, 10:16 PM)Glow Wrote: As to saying womens has to do with loss of wealth or value that is a societal construct. The perceived loss of value for women, and gaining of value for men YIKES do you see where that idea came from?

    It’s not reality.
    That’s men deciding their red ray determines women’s value and women believing what they are told.
    Glow, it's in the definition, sexual MARKET value. Yes of course it's a social construct. And yes, of course men decide what gives women sexual market value, just like women decide what gives men their sexual market value.

    It's like women get their ideas about men from Hollywood, thinking they should all work till they drop dead while playing the sauve bond type. "Happy wife, happy life" afterall. See how this game is played. But NO-ONE is saying YOU or ANYONE needs to play this stupid game.

    (05-06-2020, 10:16 PM)Glow Wrote: Sure the princess storey can be part of a hero’s journey but it certainly is not the 1 option for women in their hero’s journey. We are quite varied, and full of potential for transformation.

    Actually, the female initiation story spoken about was realising that the 'princess' role is a temptation and full of lies to keep women AWAY from their potential and wisdom, which is in opposition to the Cinderella story (where a man saves the day) which is way more popular in popular media.

    But at the end of the day, who cares, these are all just ideas. People are allowed to think whatever the ell they want.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    female wanderers - by flow - 05-05-2020, 03:11 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 03:56 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by flow - 05-05-2020, 04:07 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 04:22 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-05-2020, 10:18 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 10:40 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-05-2020, 12:36 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by sillypumpkins - 05-05-2020, 10:46 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Agua - 05-05-2020, 11:15 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Agua - 05-05-2020, 11:21 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 11:31 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Black Dragon - 05-05-2020, 12:33 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 07:16 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by flow - 05-06-2020, 06:35 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-06-2020, 11:54 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-06-2020, 09:07 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by flow - 05-08-2020, 11:48 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-08-2020, 05:50 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Diana - 05-06-2020, 11:22 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Hilarion - 05-06-2020, 03:49 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-06-2020, 07:40 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-06-2020, 08:29 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-06-2020, 10:16 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-06-2020, 11:07 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-06-2020, 11:26 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by sillypumpkins - 05-06-2020, 03:54 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-06-2020, 04:26 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by sillypumpkins - 05-06-2020, 05:08 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-06-2020, 08:23 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-06-2020, 08:24 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-06-2020, 09:00 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by sillypumpkins - 05-06-2020, 09:43 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-06-2020, 09:54 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-06-2020, 11:03 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-06-2020, 11:23 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-06-2020, 11:42 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-07-2020, 12:06 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-06-2020, 11:29 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-07-2020, 12:15 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-07-2020, 12:22 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Ray711 - 05-07-2020, 03:33 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Hilarion - 05-07-2020, 04:28 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-07-2020, 08:16 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Agua - 05-08-2020, 03:42 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-07-2020, 04:40 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Spaced - 05-07-2020, 09:36 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Glow - 05-07-2020, 05:57 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-07-2020, 06:39 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-07-2020, 07:44 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-08-2020, 06:10 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-08-2020, 07:44 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-08-2020, 09:33 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-08-2020, 10:18 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Dtris - 05-07-2020, 11:09 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Louisabell - 05-08-2020, 04:16 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-08-2020, 12:20 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 05-08-2020, 12:29 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by flow - 05-08-2020, 02:09 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by Navaratna - 05-08-2020, 02:34 PM
    RE: female wanderers - by meadow-foreigner - 05-19-2020, 03:54 AM
    RE: female wanderers - by NoBodyNoThing - 05-19-2020, 05:10 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode