Comparing Ra and the Cassiopaeans

[Asolsutsesvyl]

Another possibility is that the Cassiopaean information was, in part, designed to attract and co-opt people with an Orion STO background.

The main theories I have at present about the nature of the C's are:

1. (Older) A 6D STO contact came in association with higher-density STS intermediaries engaged in the "blending of the service patterns". (The C's claim that beings who do so are sometimes in touch with 6D STO.) Clues as to the nature of the Cassiopaean Experiment may then, in part, be deliberate slips of positive origin.

2. (Newer) A negative imitation from the beginning, the manifestation of the true nature gradually growing down through the densities over the years. Symbolic clues may in part be explained by Laura's old synthesis which drew upon Michael Topper: some "law" of higher-density existence makes it a must for symbolic clues to be provided by high-level negative beings as to their real nature, as this preserves the free will of those convinced by the deception, to the benefit of the manipulator. (It isn't "good food" unless "eaten" with free will intact.)

Maybe that's too thin a summary to make all that much sense. To expand on it a bit, and also add another theory I've basically discarded for now...

Laura's life, which I've read about in earlier years (including her autobiography), contains plenty of 4D-related stuff, from psychic phenomena to alien abduction and more. It's obvious that she has a higher-density body and is not just 3D.

The higher-density mind is, I think, firmly in charge following her personal "shamanic initiation" ordeals. That's what "shamanic initiation" is all about, for people with a higher-density being of their own; a process of it "growing down" into fully directing the incarnation. (It may take several years, may turn the 3D inner world inside-out several times, and has nothing to do with any "initiation" which an external person can hand you with mere symbols or ritual.)

That was before Montalk's unpleasant experiences with her, and possibly, at the 3D level, Laura actually believes fully in what she claimed about Montalk and others; a switch is flipped, so to say, and Laura's 3D mind constructs an explanation and she genuinely believes it. (This 3D-sincerity may greatly have helped her convince people.)

If Laura became spiritually corrupted, as Montalk believes, then the corruption must have taken place in 4D rather than 3D.

I tend away from that explanation for basically the same reason I don't think Laura was positive and the C's negative (Laura then spiritually falling in 1994).

The symbolic patterns and structure of Laura's life, described by her extensively, truly make the dangling threads all come together with the Cassiopaean Experiment. Decades of stuff led up to it. The simplest explanations which seem to take everything into account make for Laura's life simply unfolding according to "plan", without any sudden changes of spiritual polarity.

Unless someone comes up with things which add clarity and change the above big picture, that basically seems to leave the two main theories I briefly mentioned.