01-09-2011, 04:19 AM
what was Q'uo's answer?
We are one. What one does, affects the other. That is the basic.
Without proper communication, no one can predict the affect of one person's actions on the other.
We may go on believing that we are serving all, yet we may be doing disservice to some as we do so.
Communication is the answer.
We are one. What one does, affects the other. That is the basic.
Without proper communication, no one can predict the affect of one person's actions on the other.
We may go on believing that we are serving all, yet we may be doing disservice to some as we do so.
Communication is the answer.
(01-09-2011, 02:58 AM)Eric Wrote: Hey everyone,
I have rarely run in to sessions where Quo's response to queries have been somewhat less than satisfying, but I found one that was channeled on Oct 16th 2010. The opening question is so good that I thought it would be interesting to let our friends here on B4th have a crack at it also. Here's a quote from the opening question:
Quote:The question this evening, Q’uo, [from G], is, “Few systems of thought confer as much responsibility on the individual entity as the Law of One does. In that philosophy, the individual is completely responsible for its own choices and its experience no matter how uninformed these choices and its viewpoint may be. It is in that vein that we wish to examine the concept of responsibility through both the general and focused lens. In general, to what extent is the positively-oriented entity responsible for indirectly participating in activities which result in pain and suffering for others? There are many specific ways to approach the basic underlying principle of responsibility, including purchasing gasoline, using products which harm the environment, supporting or not resisting governments which funnel the energy of their people into nefarious ends, etc.
The gasoline example is especially interesting. What do you think?