05-09-2019, 05:37 PM
(05-09-2019, 05:27 PM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: Okay, I'm really struggling to break through your extremely black and white thinking. Since when is physical prowess purely about brute force? Not all the men on the NFL team are 300lb+ monsters that absorb hits. Agility is important. What about dexterity? The team would fall apart without players with these traits, and these are the types of traits that cheerleaders also possess. Anyway, again, this is such a strawman. Sure, NFL players are the most physically fit athletes basically. What about baseball players? They absolutely do not do the same type of conditioning that football players do, most of them sit around for 95% of the game doing nothing. Less people watch baseball. Yet there is no salary cap, so the highest paid NFL players make a fraction of the highest paid baseball players. So there is no relativity in this, I was just using it as an example that I thought would be difficult to argue against. I see that I was wrong.
Quote:Actually, male motorcycle police are expected to be able to lift their bike back up if they fall and female are not, this is one example of blatant matriarchy causing danger to the community. The females cant do it, too weak, males can. That kind of matriarchy has no place in a civilized society, placing others in danger to compensate for being physically weaker.
Again, the idea that feminism/"the matriarchy" is about women wanting to do the same jobs to earn wages as men do is a huge strawman. This is a distraction and a misunderstanding. In fact, if I reply to this thread further I'm not going to be paying attention to these types of statements anymore, just as a heads up. I know this is remedial work, and I'm trying to be patient here, but we can't carry on a discussion if you aren't actually reading my posts.
Okay, if you feel its a good choice.