01-25-2019, 06:14 AM
Just like someone said.
Infinite nothingness would be a thing of its own definable by not being finite and not being something, such an infinite nothingness would have a point in it that defines it to those not infinite and nothing as being, infinite and nothing.
The best example of this is https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5aqylr this episode of star trek.
In other words, if there is an infinite field of somethings, eventually one of those develops sentiences and starts to play inside of itself for new things instead of into the infinite field, this creates more complexity and eventually it becomes an intelligent infinity that spreads outwards for infinite for those inside.
In other words, the exietence of the logos and the universe is a certainty in a field of random happenings large enough, in other words, the infinity.
Infinite nothingness would be a thing of its own definable by not being finite and not being something, such an infinite nothingness would have a point in it that defines it to those not infinite and nothing as being, infinite and nothing.
The best example of this is https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5aqylr this episode of star trek.
In other words, if there is an infinite field of somethings, eventually one of those develops sentiences and starts to play inside of itself for new things instead of into the infinite field, this creates more complexity and eventually it becomes an intelligent infinity that spreads outwards for infinite for those inside.
In other words, the exietence of the logos and the universe is a certainty in a field of random happenings large enough, in other words, the infinity.