Ra's Code

[Nabil Naser]

You know what. I am not going to discuss anything with you Unity100.

I do not know where you come with this stuff?
You have no clue still what I am talking about. This is obvious from you latest questions. I feel that it is a waste of time discussing anything with you. You are free to share anything you want, but don't expect me to continue with this charade.

Please remember that you don't have to read this stuff.

That's Great

I think that we have come to an understanding.
But let me correct something you said, I never claimed that the possible English code had a divine source. In fact, it appears suspicious. Other sources hint at the information without such exactness.
In any case, I am glad that this misunderstanding is over.

we havent come to an understanding, for you havent cleared anything or said one or the other.

so, you are saying that the proposition of english language bible and word god and that 'geometry', is suspicious ?

and then why are you proceeding like the below :

And each sphere from the square is connected to 3 other spheres.
If we continue reading the Stanzas, we find that it describes other aspects of the geometry.

The same principle applies to other religions.

you are basically saying that 'in order to verify that this proposition of geometry/bible/language word god holds, read other religious scripture'.

again, this is not our burden to undertake. the proposer is tasked with the proof of the proposition.


so basically, you are saying that the proposition you have made sounds suspicious to you, but you are telling us to read bibles and whatnot and confirm it ?

and why should we do it ?