Ra's Code

[Nabil Naser]

That's Great

I think that we have come to an understanding.
But let me correct something you said, I never claimed that the possible English code had a divine source. In fact, it appears suspicious. Other sources hint at the information without such exactness.
In any case, I am glad that this misunderstanding is over.

I don't know what to say anymore, Unity.
You have asked the same question several times, and I have answered it several times. Yet you are asking it again.
This tells one of two things. Either you are not reading my responses, or you don't understand them.
Just for the record, here is the answer one more time.
I found possible code in English, that agrees with the spheres theory that I have had.
So, the idea of the spheres is what is important, not the English code. I also said that maybe the English code is just a bunch of coincidence that seem to agree with the geometry.
I said that the basic code of packed spheres has nothing to do with language, because it is based on geometry and numbers.
Now, If you are gonna ask me again about English, what am I supposed to believe, since I already told you that it is not about language?
We do not care about language when we work with octaves, or Egyptian, Indian, or other scripture. Yet we still use the geometry of packed spheres.
If this can't explain it to you, then I give up, because I really do not think that I can make myself any clearer.

if you do not care about language, then do not put english language word god, or any excerpt in english language bible as 'supporting' factors or evidence or pointers to what you are presenting.

you have done this. and when queried about the other language bibles, you have first said that it would only make sense because english was the most widely spoken language. this was incorrect, as i have linked various statistics. then when i further queried, you have said that you havent researched the situation in those other language bibles and word 'god' in other languages, but you said that you thought probable analogies would also be in there.

when i queried for proof of this proposition in other languages, you have told me to use logic and see myself.

when i have said that it was not my duty or burden to provide proof for what idea you are proposing, but yours, you have gone dogmatic and said

let me get something clear, Unity100.

Spheres are the origin of all things.
The creator experiences itself through the geometry of spheres

Now. You can take it, or leave it

to which i responded didnt have to 'take it or leave it', and people participating here were not here for dogma.

now you are again going around and saying that you have replied to my queries.

let me put it bluntly as i see it :

you have not replied to anything i have asked. what you are refusing to admit is, there is no similar 'proof' in these other language bibles and word 'god' in other languages, to the proposition of packed sphere 1-7 arithmetic. it does not hold. and because you have shown that as somewhat 'divine' supplementary proof as to the idea you have proposed, you are not able to back from your initial claim and say that they do not hold in those other languages. and because they will come up as not satisfying your proposition, you are unwilling to delve into them and put arithmetic up for them either.

it is understandable that someone may go excited on some idea/philosophy one is discovering, and make a rather broad assumption and statement, like you did with this 'word god and bible supports this'. it happens.

what is not understandable, and moreover, what is unacceptable is that, being unwilling to prove/verify it and accuse those who question/query it with unreceptiveness, impoliteness, negativity and whatnot and being dogmatic and assertive about it.

All the ideas that I am presenting depend on one thing, and that is the geometry of packed spheres.
It is impossible to understand what I am sharing without considering the geometry. While simple, it is the source of all complexity.

and that complexity, doesnt hold for latin bible and latin word for god. or hebrew. or, german.

if, idea of packed spheres was 'the' thing from the start, as you proposed it, you should have stayed in the original proposition, and didnt put a grand assumption about particular christian religion in english language words and bible.

because, this was precisely what you have done, even going to the extra mile of suggesting a divine hand in this coincidence happening. however, that coincidence, remained limited to the english language, which isnt even the most commonly spoken language, or the original language (or the longest duration language) that christianity had been practiced in.