12-26-2010, 03:20 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-26-2010, 03:48 AM by Nabil Naser.)
I don't know what to say anymore, Unity.
You have asked the same question several times, and I have answered it several times. Yet you are asking it again.
This tells one of two things. Either you are not reading my responses, or you don't understand them.
Just for the record, here is the answer one more time.
I found possible code in English, that agrees with the spheres theory that I have had.
So, the idea of the spheres is what is important, not the English code. I also said that maybe the English code is just a bunch of coincidence that seem to agree with the geometry.
I said that the basic code of packed spheres has nothing to do with language, because it is based on geometry and numbers.
Now, If you are gonna ask me again about English, what am I supposed to believe, since I already told you that it is not about language?
We do not care about language when we work with octaves, or Egyptian, Indian, or other scripture. Yet we still use the geometry of packed spheres.
If this can't explain it to you, then I give up, because I really do not think that I can make myself any clearer.
All the ideas that I am presenting depend on one thing, and that is the geometry of packed spheres.
It is impossible to understand what I am sharing without considering the geometry. While simple, it is the source of all complexity.
You have asked the same question several times, and I have answered it several times. Yet you are asking it again.
This tells one of two things. Either you are not reading my responses, or you don't understand them.
Just for the record, here is the answer one more time.
I found possible code in English, that agrees with the spheres theory that I have had.
So, the idea of the spheres is what is important, not the English code. I also said that maybe the English code is just a bunch of coincidence that seem to agree with the geometry.
I said that the basic code of packed spheres has nothing to do with language, because it is based on geometry and numbers.
Now, If you are gonna ask me again about English, what am I supposed to believe, since I already told you that it is not about language?
We do not care about language when we work with octaves, or Egyptian, Indian, or other scripture. Yet we still use the geometry of packed spheres.
If this can't explain it to you, then I give up, because I really do not think that I can make myself any clearer.
(12-24-2010, 05:16 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote: let me get something clear, Unity100.
Spheres are the origin of all things.
The creator experiences itself through the geometry of spheres
Now. You can take it, or leave it
(12-24-2010, 04:55 AM)unity100 Wrote:(12-24-2010, 04:22 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote:(12-24-2010, 03:57 AM)unity100 Wrote: ...............
you are quoting what i said to you, to me, because ?
i wasnt the one who came up with packed spheres proposition, and claimed that there were pointers to its validity in religions and cited english bible, english language for that, and then dodged when queried whether it holds for other languages.
i dont have to prove anything to you - i didnt propose anything, i just queried you on the validity of the proposition you are bringing.
...............
so, i take it that what you propose do not hold valid for languages other than english, and the bibles other than english ?
that is what i understand from your dodging that query and the subsequent proof it requires.
Let me tell you what the code is all about, in my humble opinion
The code describes the origin of creation of light, and the universe
The origin is specific, and t is related to specific geometry
Ra's Code describes this origin and this geometry.
From human perspective, the code appears related to what humans can percieve. It is related to space, time, and differentiations in between.
The one shape that all can relate to is that of the sphere. We live on a sphere, and are alive because of a sphere.
The code explains how light was created, and what was created with the light.
That's it. That's what the code is all about.
All the ideas that I am presenting depend on one thing, and that is the geometry of packed spheres.
It is impossible to understand what I am sharing without considering the geometry. While simple, it is the source of all complexity.