12-09-2018, 02:25 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-09-2018, 10:01 AM by redchartreuse.)
Yes- I think there were some additional views interjected into the question I posted that I did not express, nor accurately portray my current beliefs on the matter. It's alright though... Conversing about these topics can be difficult, and especially in a forum format where we don't have the benefit on nonverbal cues.
The question of my own level of "wokeness" is not really relavent, but suffice it to say I am doing the work... Growing...seeking... Evolving. I have made my choice, and so I'm not one languishing in the sinkhole of indifference.
Which leads to the salient question of what I mean by "spiritually asleep".. I mean in the same sense as Q'uo means it... As in having hit the "pause" or "snooze" button on one's evolution.
If the goal of incarnation is to grow, and if all this care and foreplanning goes into an incarnation .. with the soul choosing the environment which it feels would be best suited for growth, then it seems odd to have hundreds of millions of "sleeping" souls to have chosen to incarnate to early 21st century earth.
Surely, if it was not the soul's intention to grow...say maybe souls take a "vacation incarnation" every now and again.. that is all well and good, but wouldn't such a soul choose to incarnate into a more harmonious world?
I think Glow captured the essence of the query:
Bingo. If we are to believe what Q'uo explains about the "seniority system" of incarnation, then we must conclude that souls of these hundreds of millions of people languishing in the sinkhole of indifference are actually the most likely to grow and evolve as a result of incarnating here.
So therefore.. either I am very confused about Q'uos teachings here, or something has gone quite amiss with respect to the way souls are choosing when/where to incarnate.
I'm OK with either possibility. Or some other option I haven't seen. But speculating about my own level of wokeness doesn't really come to bear on the question one way or another.
Since clearly, if I were "fully awake" myself, I would probably not be asking the question, or even be incarnated here/now to be able to ask it.
The question of my own level of "wokeness" is not really relavent, but suffice it to say I am doing the work... Growing...seeking... Evolving. I have made my choice, and so I'm not one languishing in the sinkhole of indifference.
Which leads to the salient question of what I mean by "spiritually asleep".. I mean in the same sense as Q'uo means it... As in having hit the "pause" or "snooze" button on one's evolution.
If the goal of incarnation is to grow, and if all this care and foreplanning goes into an incarnation .. with the soul choosing the environment which it feels would be best suited for growth, then it seems odd to have hundreds of millions of "sleeping" souls to have chosen to incarnate to early 21st century earth.
Surely, if it was not the soul's intention to grow...say maybe souls take a "vacation incarnation" every now and again.. that is all well and good, but wouldn't such a soul choose to incarnate into a more harmonious world?
I think Glow captured the essence of the query:
Quote: if this is such a spiritually relevant time with the hierarchy of incarnations being given to those with the best chance of moving towards love/unity why are the masses not stirring?”
Bingo. If we are to believe what Q'uo explains about the "seniority system" of incarnation, then we must conclude that souls of these hundreds of millions of people languishing in the sinkhole of indifference are actually the most likely to grow and evolve as a result of incarnating here.
So therefore.. either I am very confused about Q'uos teachings here, or something has gone quite amiss with respect to the way souls are choosing when/where to incarnate.
I'm OK with either possibility. Or some other option I haven't seen. But speculating about my own level of wokeness doesn't really come to bear on the question one way or another.
Since clearly, if I were "fully awake" myself, I would probably not be asking the question, or even be incarnated here/now to be able to ask it.