David Wilcock

[Bring4th_Steve]

I would also like to add that whenever I see others becoming critical of something or someone, it is best to remind those (who will listen! :-) that we are here on 3D Earth to "experience". David is no more special than any of us. He is simply a tool, a catalyst, an experience that has crossed most of our paths at some point during our truth seeking.

My strongest point is that it doesn't MATTER what Wilcock says, even if he is outright lying! If one seeks the truth, one will find it along his/her individual path at some point. Maybe it ultimately won't be by Wilcock, but by another person that you found through him. In other words, DW's contributions to 3D Earth are no different than our own contributions--to provide a means for us to see a reflection of ourselves and decide if it is who we are, or who we are not.

That's it, guys! We don't need to analyze anyone any further or to judge others as to whether the information we take in from day to day is credible and truthful, or fake and imagined. If we are asking ourselves to find truth, we will encounter experiences that lead us down that path. If others are looking for lies and fear-based information, that too will align and begin to resonate with them. The information we perceive serves as triggers and path marks, guideposts and suggestions in helping us to see what resonates with our own selves. Are we not here to know ourselves so that the Creator can know itself in a way that only you can uniquely perceive? Ok! Well? Think! Whatever truth/trash we perceive is helping us to understand who we are by our own will to accept or deny what we perceive. We then follow what we resonate with by further pursuing information of similar characteristics. For many, this becomes recognized as our life path, or our path of seeking. And on this path we all will come across information that might seem truthful to one person, but not to another, just as 3D Sunset pointed out. Certainly while we are all one, we are infinitely different in the various ways of pursuing information that is presented as "truth". We are all picking and choosing off the grand buffet table of life experiences, chewing on or spitting out these unique experiences in order to better understand ourselves as only we can.

If you can appreciate this attempt to drag us all back to the "big picture" or even sit and think about these words applied to everything in life and not just DW, I am confident that you will realize this thread has become a matter of ego and separation, and not of appreciation and unity.

For the record, I am neither for or against David. I have read tons of his material, which at one point resonated very strongly with me. A few years later, here I am, no longer resonating with his material and not caring one bit to pursue his interests. For me, he was a stepping stone. I literally loved him when I was excitedly visiting his web site for his next big blog post, and now I am honoring his efforts as a reflection of me that can no longer tolerate his material. He offered me just what I needed to get to the next step in my seeking of truth. Perhaps that is you, too! Or perhaps you are comfortable enough that you have found your truth in him, and are happy living the rest of your life that way. There is no right or wrong.

That is your decision, the beauty of free will, and the brilliance of being able to seek truth in a million different ways, no matter how truth might get to us.

Please, all... Even though we are politely debating, please take a step back and consider renewing some appreciation or "agreeing to disagree", and moving on from these comparisons and judgments. Bizarre or brilliant, DW is part of the same tapestry of life experiences as you are.

Peace out!
Steve