I have emailed the author and PHD physicist, Johan Masreliez, asking if he can enlighten me, myself being a humble novice at Physics, to better understand his body of work which seems to be overlooked.
He responded within 2 hours, lending me a link to download a book in which he describes the theory in layman's terms.
I have started reading the book, which is free with amazon's Kindle (for PC and otherwise), and it has been very informative and easy to read.
While red-shift is apparently a big focal point on the subject matter of the book, it seems to disagree with his theory only when applied using the CBM model. He is suggesting something radical: that scale is also expanding instead of just space. The PHD is suggesting that time is also expanding along with space, unlike what the current standard model suggests (that only space is expanding).
This new idea shakes the foundation of cosmology, and is unpalatable to most scientists, he explains. Despite his troubles he presses on to try and make this idea more accessible and in the hands of the every day person. While he has fought tooth and nail to shed mathematical insight via proofs and Physics papers, he has instead started to turn his attention to making it accessible to people like myself who have no super technical backgrounds in the realm of Physics.
Anyway, the major premise of the findings is the universe may be everlasting, and producing energy according to this model. With scale changing by perspective of the observer, (in my understanding from what I read) this means that instead of 14 billion years being the age of the universe, it is more like the "viewable distance" we can peer at, like a sailor seeing the watery horizon that is never quite reachable. In all directions and from every vantage point, 14 billion years is seemingly as far back as time goes. Dr Masreliez is suggesting that the scale of time also changes, suggesting that as you go back, years didn't change in their frame of reference, but they got shorter in comparison to a year in the now. Like an infinite series, despite it seeming like a finite 14 billion years, in this way there are actually infinite divisions of years to the unreachable "beginning".
A truly fascinating read, I am so grateful to have his time and honest thoughts writing to me in a moment's notice via email.
In case when reading this you are curious, the book is very accessible, being free for Kindle users on amazon. The title is The Progression of Time: How the expansion of space and time forms our world and powers the universe, and by word of the author himself, can be accessed here: https://www.amazon.com/Progression-Time-...B00D52WWSS.
*edit*: I realize this may seem trite, but I am honestly hoping to find the solution to my uneasy feelings towards a "big bang" scenario. I have had reserved feelings for such in the past, and I didn't feel I was doing the author justice in dismissing it based on opinions of people who give it less time and credence than it really deserves. As with everything I set out to do, I try to do so humbly and without judgement. I feel that this has paid off in large part to my stance on such matters.
He responded within 2 hours, lending me a link to download a book in which he describes the theory in layman's terms.
I have started reading the book, which is free with amazon's Kindle (for PC and otherwise), and it has been very informative and easy to read.
While red-shift is apparently a big focal point on the subject matter of the book, it seems to disagree with his theory only when applied using the CBM model. He is suggesting something radical: that scale is also expanding instead of just space. The PHD is suggesting that time is also expanding along with space, unlike what the current standard model suggests (that only space is expanding).
This new idea shakes the foundation of cosmology, and is unpalatable to most scientists, he explains. Despite his troubles he presses on to try and make this idea more accessible and in the hands of the every day person. While he has fought tooth and nail to shed mathematical insight via proofs and Physics papers, he has instead started to turn his attention to making it accessible to people like myself who have no super technical backgrounds in the realm of Physics.
Anyway, the major premise of the findings is the universe may be everlasting, and producing energy according to this model. With scale changing by perspective of the observer, (in my understanding from what I read) this means that instead of 14 billion years being the age of the universe, it is more like the "viewable distance" we can peer at, like a sailor seeing the watery horizon that is never quite reachable. In all directions and from every vantage point, 14 billion years is seemingly as far back as time goes. Dr Masreliez is suggesting that the scale of time also changes, suggesting that as you go back, years didn't change in their frame of reference, but they got shorter in comparison to a year in the now. Like an infinite series, despite it seeming like a finite 14 billion years, in this way there are actually infinite divisions of years to the unreachable "beginning".
A truly fascinating read, I am so grateful to have his time and honest thoughts writing to me in a moment's notice via email.
In case when reading this you are curious, the book is very accessible, being free for Kindle users on amazon. The title is The Progression of Time: How the expansion of space and time forms our world and powers the universe, and by word of the author himself, can be accessed here: https://www.amazon.com/Progression-Time-...B00D52WWSS.
*edit*: I realize this may seem trite, but I am honestly hoping to find the solution to my uneasy feelings towards a "big bang" scenario. I have had reserved feelings for such in the past, and I didn't feel I was doing the author justice in dismissing it based on opinions of people who give it less time and credence than it really deserves. As with everything I set out to do, I try to do so humbly and without judgement. I feel that this has paid off in large part to my stance on such matters.