12-17-2010, 03:44 AM
(12-17-2010, 02:37 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote: Actually, the word GOD, and all the stuff about language in religion, is irrelevant to the basic ideas. That was just additional information. Mere observations of how letters and numbers seem to agree in English.
you have put forth that agreement, as an indicator of universal applicability, and the validity of the basic sphere idea you have been proposing.
if it does not hold with any/all that is out there, it means it is not universal, and cant be shown as a proof of anything being valid.
Quote:We are talking about spheres, not religious teachings, or language. The books describe exact geometry. For example, the 6 days of creation is a number, and has nothing to do with any particular language. The same is true about all the numbers. Some words describe structures, and creatures, which can have a shape, or ratios, or function. This can be interpreted within the basic geometry of spheres.
genesis is another caanan/middle east religion myth, that comes from the abrahamic roots all these religions come from, and further, the ancient middle east roots these come from.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_cre...st_context
these are not found in other cultures, such as :
chinese (deneb origin) (1.3 billion population)
american indians, south americans (deneb origin)
indians (origin unknown) (~1.2 billion population)
africans (origin unknown) (~1 billion population)
these are not found in cultures which encompass more than 3.5 billion population on this planet. in the past, the cultures which had the abrahamic roots was probably even less in number, compared to the cultures which had not. (middle east was not higher in population compared to other regions).
Quote:In difference to you, Unity, I am going to stop sharing information related to any specific language. I will stick with the logic of numbers, and the general information in words that is agreed upon.
i very much think that, in order for your numerology and sphere theory to have any validity, you need to stop trying to link it to religions/philosophies/ideologies coming from middle east/caanan. actually it would be better not to attempt to link it to any specific culture, however we are told that these cultures had a negative influence in their past, and their religions and their books and cultures have been consciously and single handedly shaped by various kings, emperors, reformers and so on.