12-16-2010, 11:00 PM
Hello Monica
The words that you quoted were not directed towards everyone here. I am happy and grateful to all of you.
It was directed at Unity100, who I felt was not asking anything specific about the material I was sharing, while at the same time putting it down.
We have since worked it out. I think.
The words that you quoted were not directed towards everyone here. I am happy and grateful to all of you.
It was directed at Unity100, who I felt was not asking anything specific about the material I was sharing, while at the same time putting it down.
We have since worked it out. I think.
(12-16-2010, 07:58 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(12-16-2010, 03:31 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote: This is the first time that you have a specific question. Your attitude was belittling from the beginning
Respectfully, Nabil, several people have been asking questions, and we welcome the free exchange of ideas here. Please do not interpret the asking of questions, or even the expressing of doubt, as belittling.
Thank you for sharing your theories and research.
(12-16-2010, 03:31 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote: The G-D is used by the Jews, and the word GOD is used by the Christians. You can find them in their bible. Any bible.
When given values to the letters they agree with the geometry of packed spheres. For example, each sphere has the potential of being at the center of 4 circles of 7. The numbers 7 and 4 repeat often.
The word GOD can be found by adding the radius and area of a circle. When interpreted on the geometry, this indicates that the radius must be outside the area since the area already has all possible radius. This is like the strike of the Cobra.
The values are 7 154 which is G O D.
I definitely agree with you that patterns are to be found, but I'm not sure what you are suggesting as to the significance of those patterns.
When you say that this geometry 'explains the Law of One' and link it to the name for what the authors of the ancient books thought was God, are you suggesting that this validates their views?
Please correct me if I am misunderstanding you!
My personal view is that what the ancient tribes thought was 'God' was not what we consider the One Infinite Creator, but a negative entity masquerading as 'God.' Thus, I'm not quite sure what to make of your conclusions, since I don't think of the 'God' of the Bible to be 'God' at all.
I realize that you aren't claiming to have all the answers regarding interpretation. I'm just expressing my own observations about what you have presented.
(12-16-2010, 03:31 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote: the number of rotation will be exactly the number of hours in 6 days "six days of creation". 6*24*60*60. This is the same geometry of the Octave that we talked about, where we found the values for GOD and G-D, and Jesus.
Being that the '6 days of creation' is symbolic, since we know the Earth wasn't actually created in 6 days, I'm not sure what to make of that correlation.
Numerologically, the number 6 refers to the completion of the physical manifestation.
(12-16-2010, 03:31 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote: We can even find interpretation from Adam and Eve and explain how they are joined by a rib, and why they are united till death breaks them apart.
I consider that story to be a myth, much like any other tribal creation myth. I suppose any myth, from any culture or religion, will have numerological significance. Patterns abound everywhere.
(12-16-2010, 03:31 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote: You can ignore it all, and still have enough information to explain The Law of One.
If anyone figures out how to explain the Law of One, please do let us know! Haha that is what we're trying to do here. I don't think it's quite as simple as that. All perspectives are valid and add a tiny piece to the puzzle. Thank you for sharing yours!
(12-16-2010, 03:31 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote: I don't know about other codes or other languages. I am just sharing what I know. I do not claim that I understand what all this means.
OK. Fair enough. Thank you for that clarification! I hope you will understand that others might not readily know what exactly you are claiming to understand, and thus ask questions. When a statement is made, implying that something 'explains the Law of One' then that is going to generate a lot of questions, doubts, and counterpoints, simply because we don't consider the Law of One to be quite so easily explainable.