(12-15-2010, 07:37 PM)Nabil Naser Wrote: First of all, the part that you are referring to is a tiny fraction of the information provided.
what of it is tiny 'fraction'. you are basically basing your numerology on english language.
Quote: Second, it makes a lot of sense to me that the information is related to the English language, because the way I see it, English is the most used language today. If the mystery is to be revealed at this time, English would be the best language to use.
thats not correct.
http://www.photius.com/rankings/languages2.html
in terms of spoken languages, mandarin is almost triple the number of people speaking it.
spanish, is only 25% lower than english.
in terms of NATIVE speakers,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lan...e_speakers
english is only the third.
........
and there is no argument behind 'english is the best language to use'.
Quote:It is possible that other languages have similar information. Just because I found some that is related to English, doesn't mean that I found it all.
The calculations that relate to The Law of One is a lot more than the few number/letter codes described in that small part that you are referring to.
your calculations seem to be based on bible, english language. you seem to be wanting to link these, to Ra material, and eventually Law of One they speak of.
this is what i understand. and :
Quote:I would rather that you discuss the information itself, and if you feel that it is wrong, or does not make sense to you, then please share that view.
we are discussing the information itself, the very things that you are providing as proof to that information. if the proof are not sound, the code approach you are providing cannot be said valid.
Quote:You are simply throwing objections without any validation. I percieve this as unproductive, unhelpful, and negative in nature.
no, you are providing information without proof. and then expecting us to go with it, without proper logic, or proof. it doesnt matter whether these are your ideas and approaches. you can present them as you wish. however, you are obliged to present logic, justification, rationalization behind them, when the people query about them. this is the purpose of sharing information and learning together in a forum.
what is negative in nature is, accusing others of being unreceptive, when they query about the validity of what you tell them. ra material is not a dogma. people who are being attracted to it, and subsequently to this forum, are not after dogma. we are going to naturally query, and try to analyze and understand what we see. your approach seems to be 'here is what i present as proof. take it, be receptive to it, and dont question it. if you question it, then it means you are unproductive, unhelpful, negative in nature'.
we cannot just accept a numerologic 'proof' because a word in a particular language on the face of the planet validates some other numeric equation given based on some other stuff. there are 7 billion people on this planet at this moment. english speakers arent even 1/14 of this population.