12-15-2010, 07:37 PM
First of all, the part that you are referring to is a tiny fraction of the information provided.
Second, it makes a lot of sense to me that the information is related to the English language, because the way I see it, English is the most used language today. If the mystery is to be revealed at this time, English would be the best language to use.
It is possible that other languages have similar information. Just because I found some that is related to English, doesn't mean that I found it all.
The calculations that relate to The Law of One is a lot more than the few number/letter codes described in that small part that you are referring to.
I would rather that you discuss the information itself, and if you feel that it is wrong, or does not make sense to you, then please share that view.
You are simply throwing objections without any validation. I percieve this as unproductive, unhelpful, and negative in nature.
Second, it makes a lot of sense to me that the information is related to the English language, because the way I see it, English is the most used language today. If the mystery is to be revealed at this time, English would be the best language to use.
It is possible that other languages have similar information. Just because I found some that is related to English, doesn't mean that I found it all.
The calculations that relate to The Law of One is a lot more than the few number/letter codes described in that small part that you are referring to.
I would rather that you discuss the information itself, and if you feel that it is wrong, or does not make sense to you, then please share that view.
You are simply throwing objections without any validation. I percieve this as unproductive, unhelpful, and negative in nature.
(12-15-2010, 06:07 PM)unity100 Wrote:(12-15-2010, 11:36 AM)Nabil Naser Wrote: It is better to consider the information first, before you dismiss it. Once you have considered it, then you can make judgment.
I must say that you appear to be trying to discredit without knowing what is being offered.
I never said that this information is easy to relate to.
(12-14-2010, 02:56 AM)unity100 Wrote: so, ra's code, all these universal calculations regarding infinity, this, that, reflect on words from english language.
how about latin ? abrahamic ?
i am considering it. i am wondering whether this code works in latin, or hebrew or any other ancient religions that have been behind the idea of god.
its not that it is an 'information' that is not 'easy' to relate to. it seems to be only fitting the modern form of english language, one of the many languages on the face of this planet.
english language is only there in a recognizeable form since 1000 AD or so. and even in another 500 years, it was not used for anything related to religion.
so, basically, since early roman days of christianity around 100 AD or so, latin was the language that was spoken in matters relating to the religion of 'one god' originating from middle east, until 1500s. for 1400 years, latin has been the religion.
from earlier than 100 AD, there were hebrew, abrahamic languages being spoken, for a long time since moses's time.
for what numerology you speak of to be valid and meaningful, it needs to be valid for these languages too.
and that is not even mentioning other languages that are spoken on earth.