12-11-2010, 06:57 PM
AFAIK, the "Law of Confusion" is broken all of the time. Since all is one, we're all bound by each other's actions, to a greater or lesser extent, for better or worse.
The more interesting question is why would someone break the law of confusion. Wouldn't the "infringer" perceive a net gain, positive progression, or restoration of balance resulting from its actions, for example? If there was a "greeting" involved, presumably, a well-considered assessment was made. Maybe there was an opposing ideology and disastrous consequences perceived due to what must have been a likely actualization. I wonder what that actualization might have been?
The more interesting question is why would someone break the law of confusion. Wouldn't the "infringer" perceive a net gain, positive progression, or restoration of balance resulting from its actions, for example? If there was a "greeting" involved, presumably, a well-considered assessment was made. Maybe there was an opposing ideology and disastrous consequences perceived due to what must have been a likely actualization. I wonder what that actualization might have been?