12-10-2010, 08:21 PM
(12-10-2010, 06:14 PM)jivatman Wrote: The ideal of freedom from the so-called invading force of either the controlled fascism or the equally controlled social common ownership of all things would stimulate great quantities of contemplation upon the great polarization implicit in the contrast between freedom and control.
there is a catch there. it says, controlled fascism, or the equally controlled social common ownership of all things. it does not equate these things to each other.
indeed, ra says they see too much order as something inherently negative. this reflects in their statement above - if, rules and regulations go over a certain extent in social common ownership of all things, it becomes too orderly, and in Ra's perspective, negative. because, they see too much order as negative in core.
this is recoupled with their statement stating that the rise of concept of ownership, over freely giving (along with other factors) had led to a decrease in the lifespan of the entities. therefore, coupled with other statements that paint ownership concept as something pertaining to orange ray possessive blockage, this makes the concept of ownership as something undesirable in positive path.
Quote:I think the strongest case is the Ra is probably some form of anarchist, this is also supported by the Confederation, as Confederations are anarchist associations because they have no central control.
not having a central control doesnt make something unorderly or disorganized, leave aside anarchic. federation means the grouping of more than one unit, and each unit may have their own internal format. these agree and function upon commonly accepted rules and formats as a federation. this may not interfere with the entities' internal formats and rules and laws, but, it doesnt change the fact that, for acting together, there needs to be various formats agreed upon. else, if it was anarchy, there wouldnt be any confederation, federation, or any need for a federation or confederation. there would be just anarchy.
Quote:It was determined, after observation of the process of many Logoi, that polarization increased many fold if the mating were not indiscriminate. Consequent Logoi thusly preserved a bias towards the mated relationship which is more characteristic of more disciplined personalities and of what you may call higher densities.
and most ironically, this is one of the errors in the plan of this logos - monogamy is something that is inherently a trait of higher densities too, just like various other concepts. it actually is not suitable with 3d and its nature. you cant force something before its time.