12-08-2010, 08:13 PM
All this exchange is irrelevant. What is relevant is the information provided. I am not trying to discuss philosophy. I am trying to share very specific and measurable material that can explain the Law of One.
Look at the attachment and consider their value. If you find that you can't relate to them, then ignore them. If, on the other hand, you can understand them and relate to them, then you will be able to discuss the information and perhaps recognize its value.
The material is not about describing infinity, or deciding whether we can understand or not. It is a lot more complicated than that
Look at the attachment and consider their value. If you find that you can't relate to them, then ignore them. If, on the other hand, you can understand them and relate to them, then you will be able to discuss the information and perhaps recognize its value.
The material is not about describing infinity, or deciding whether we can understand or not. It is a lot more complicated than that
(12-08-2010, 08:02 PM)Turtle Wrote:(12-08-2010, 07:53 PM)unity100 Wrote:(12-08-2010, 05:18 PM)Nabil Naser Wrote: It was Ra who said that the 3rd density is not the density of understanding, but that does not mean that we need to stop trying to understand.
then why do you say that we should stop trying to understand/learn infinity ?
im not objecting to your style or anything. just the contradiction.
Are you not also trying to understand that which we are told cannot be understood in this density, unity100?
Besides...it is not really a contradiction because we do understand a lot of things about our reality, yet this is not the density of understanding. Ra stating this is not the density of understanding, does not mean you will never understand anything at all. We obviously have partial understanding of our reality as a species, and we are all here trying to expand on that.