12-07-2010, 02:48 AM
But what do we mean by "mind reading", really?
One can certainly get impressions from what a person is imagining and interpret those from their own perspective or symbol set. I think an exact match is rare or impossible, since a unique personality defines the energy patterns used to construct the source images. However, only a sufficient enough impression is needed to sync up and reconstruct a "gist".
Two or more people can also be on the same "landscape" of a shared, intersubjective mind, exploring and experiencing the same ideas simultaneously. The more in sync or on the same page the participating individuals are, the less need of words to guide.
"Mind" is a principle of nature. There is a planetary "mind", for example (i.e. racial mind, noosphere, akashic records). A person can tap into different levels of this planetary mind. One level feels like an ontological-other presence that somehow "knows" you well enough to communicate answers to your questions in extraordinarily efficient manner.
One can certainly get impressions from what a person is imagining and interpret those from their own perspective or symbol set. I think an exact match is rare or impossible, since a unique personality defines the energy patterns used to construct the source images. However, only a sufficient enough impression is needed to sync up and reconstruct a "gist".
Two or more people can also be on the same "landscape" of a shared, intersubjective mind, exploring and experiencing the same ideas simultaneously. The more in sync or on the same page the participating individuals are, the less need of words to guide.
"Mind" is a principle of nature. There is a planetary "mind", for example (i.e. racial mind, noosphere, akashic records). A person can tap into different levels of this planetary mind. One level feels like an ontological-other presence that somehow "knows" you well enough to communicate answers to your questions in extraordinarily efficient manner.