12-06-2010, 01:37 PM
unity100 Wrote:then, are universes created, by applying concentration to these yinyangs, and separating them - you have a darkness, you have a light.
does that make all of those infinite yingyangs we see dancing, as potential different existences (which contain infinite universes) ? or are dancing infinite yingyangs are each different universes ?
Ra says that the empty space we see when we look up in the sky at night is a "plenum" filled with the potential of the Creator. Quantum physics has also said something about bubble like structures that open and close in empty space and other dimensions. It all ties into the static visualization of emptiness. The dance of yin and yang.
A star then, I believe, is the potential of the surrounding space pulled together to form something. It's a distortion of the Creator, which was the empty space that was there. When all the white parts of the static, so to speak, are pulled together, only the dark parts remain. That's the darkness or vacuum that the star illuminates.
I think you're right on about those archetypes. The matrix gives birth to the potentiatior at all levels of our observable illusion. And everything that forms like that naturally is spherical, from atoms to stars. So packed sphere geometry makes sense for the physical universe.
So the real question is, how or when did infinity distort itself into the one infinite creator, which we can visualize with static. We're talking about infinity here... Our human viewpoint, our perspective of the universe, only goes so far as understanding the creator, of which we are a distortion of. This includes our habitual application of linearity to concepts outside of linear time. I think that to apply those to infinity will farther hamper an understanding of it. And part of gaining understanding is progressing through the densities. Maybe we should progress through the densities first and become the creator again before we attempt to understand that which the creator comes from.