(01-30-2018, 07:09 AM)Infinite Wrote: I'm not a fanatic vegetarian. My point is simple: They omitted the negative side of meat consumption.
This negative side being the actions against the animals (STS actions) and the metaphysical effects of meat consumption on our auras (there are black magicians who don't eat meat for that your energetc fields not lower the vibration).
But, perhaps, as someone said above, the problem was the question.
There were a couple of issues regarding questions and answers around this subject.
1. The first is that the nature of any channeled conversation will be affected by the questioner and the channeler and their distortions.
So, I think this answers your question in part. Don simply wasn't aware of or interested in that part of the effects of consuming foodstuffs. And you know Ra had to be invited to comment on anything, and prompted specifically.
2. Ra, (and presumably Q'uo and all Confederation entities), avoid obstructing free will.
We know Carla ate meat. So, how then does Ra come through and say, don't eat meat, when the channeler eats meat? That would be a violation of free will. To take it further, humans are addicted to certain foods, and many people have addictions to meat. If Ra had said that Carla should not eat meat, this could have been also infringing upon an addiction, trying to MAKE someone heal, rather than supporting one's choices while encouraging greater awareness.
There are many "living masters" who mandate a vegetarian diet for their followers. There are reasons for this, all of which I presume everyone here knows (and which Infinite has touched on). And while it may benefit the followers of such living masters to become vegetarians, it does not promote those followers to make their own choices based on their own awareness and decisions.
And this is what Ra was so concerned with. They felt they made mistakes in Egypt—of infringement. So the tip-toeing around certain subjects derives from a very careful wording and sometimes not answering at all.