What do you mean by reliable?
He publishes a lot of really good scientific discoveries that you might find meaningful.
He publishes readings of his channeling stuff, but channeled info is only as reliable as you want it to be. Ra is no more reliable than any other channeled info, the only thing that differentiates them is the message itself, and David's Ra is pretty much the same in message as the L/L Research Ra.
There are a few iffy places, but the correlation between David's Ra and LL-Ra is much closer than the correlations between Carla's Q'uo and LL-Ra.
That is to say, David's stuff all fits in very very closely to the Ra Material, even more closely than Carla's own conscious channeling. For instance Carla & Q'uo believe in a gradual ascension that lasts over the next several hundred years, whereas LL-Ra and David Ra over and over again emphasize the discontinous nature of the shift in 2012. Ra says it is like a clock striking the hour - that precise - with the galaxy itself being seen like a clock and the shift being a single discontinuous moment that is based on the specific astrology. This fits in with the Mayans and with David's work, but not with Carla's Q'uo.
So I mean it's all channeling, it's all equally unreliable, all judgments of channeling has to be based on "what resonates".
The different doctrines based on New Age channeling are as various as the different Bible interpretations. Seems like every person has their own unique interpretation. "Reliable" is not really a word that can be used for ANY channeled info.
He publishes a lot of really good scientific discoveries that you might find meaningful.
He publishes readings of his channeling stuff, but channeled info is only as reliable as you want it to be. Ra is no more reliable than any other channeled info, the only thing that differentiates them is the message itself, and David's Ra is pretty much the same in message as the L/L Research Ra.
There are a few iffy places, but the correlation between David's Ra and LL-Ra is much closer than the correlations between Carla's Q'uo and LL-Ra.
That is to say, David's stuff all fits in very very closely to the Ra Material, even more closely than Carla's own conscious channeling. For instance Carla & Q'uo believe in a gradual ascension that lasts over the next several hundred years, whereas LL-Ra and David Ra over and over again emphasize the discontinous nature of the shift in 2012. Ra says it is like a clock striking the hour - that precise - with the galaxy itself being seen like a clock and the shift being a single discontinuous moment that is based on the specific astrology. This fits in with the Mayans and with David's work, but not with Carla's Q'uo.
So I mean it's all channeling, it's all equally unreliable, all judgments of channeling has to be based on "what resonates".
The different doctrines based on New Age channeling are as various as the different Bible interpretations. Seems like every person has their own unique interpretation. "Reliable" is not really a word that can be used for ANY channeled info.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)