11-27-2010, 06:25 PM
(11-27-2010, 06:02 PM)seejay21 Wrote: Intersting comments. Why is it the "have nots" think it is their right to steal from the "haves"? Somehow they feel justified in their coveting of them, and stealing from them if only they can tell themselves that the "haves" don't deserve their rewards. Self talk of hatred for anothers accomplishment. Loathing someone for having more than you. It isn't just the big bad "man" in america that seeks copyright protection. I wonder if anyone here advocating stealing copyright material actually have any of their own.
In regards to justice, I was once in the usmc, and participated in operation restore hope in 1992/1993. We went to a small village called baidoa. There had been gangs of thugs extorting the town for its resources, and not just money, food and water. They were raping the women, and stealing their possesions, what little they had. They terrorised the town because they felt they deserved. One of the things the thugs would do is fire a recoilless rifle (a kind of artillery) into the town and kill innocent children until their demands were met.
To say it nicely, we marines put an end to this terror, and we were just. Justice was served. I don't think the thugs saw it the same way. To them, they deserved to get what they stole. They had delusions of rightousness even to the point in which they were willing to kill innocent people. They coveted to the point until they justified to themselves, murder.
This has little relevance. Negative factions fight against each other, sometimes doing something positive is in their favor in the overall situation. But ask yourself: why/how this situation (its origin) was created in the first place? Colonialism, poverty? Look at the history. The have vs have nots has deeper implications than the ones you have expressed here. The copyright issues mostly occur in this situation between the haves and the other haves... but still has general implications. Microsoft approach was encouraged while open source was discouraged by the elite (yes, THE HAVES).
The issue at hand is that these laws are being used to mitigate any spiritual longing for freedom, sharing and forming a positive 4d consciousness. Even though at the same time polarizes negative factions towards the negative.
I understand it is hard to see from a 3d world based on private property anything different. Obviously, is the capacity to share what is at stake here.