10-11-2017, 05:19 PM
Without knowing more about the specific objections, or about the specific characteristics of the speakers, it's hard to say. Personally, I think we need to get out of this rut of putting information like this in one bucket labelled "good" or "bad". L/L Research material does not have to be all things for all people, and if one is trusting others' feelings over one's own, then there's a categorically different issue at work than negative material.
Reactions to the Seth material are similar. I think the more philosophical and detached-sounding New Age stuff gets, the more nefarious it feels to some people, especially if they're used to a lot of sentimentality in their spirituality. IMHO a lot of theosophical work drops into negative territory, and that stuff tends to focus on technicalities rather than heart. But an infallible metric that rule most certainly is not.
Reactions to the Seth material are similar. I think the more philosophical and detached-sounding New Age stuff gets, the more nefarious it feels to some people, especially if they're used to a lot of sentimentality in their spirituality. IMHO a lot of theosophical work drops into negative territory, and that stuff tends to focus on technicalities rather than heart. But an infallible metric that rule most certainly is not.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)