07-20-2017, 05:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-20-2017, 05:49 PM by Steppingfeet.)
(07-20-2017, 05:04 PM)unity100 Wrote: By definition, there can only be 'one' infinity.
However, the catch is that infinity must have everything contained in itself - this means it must be multiples, along with also being 'singular'. These must exist in perfect harmony and balance inside infinity.
Thus, in any case, the concept of 'one' or 'singular' becomes inapplicable to infinity. Similarly, 'many' or 'multiple' as well. Both of them apply equally at the same time, meaning the application meaningless.
Any concept eventually evaporates, or dissolves, completely if one tries to push it too far outside the containers of human understanding and into the mystery. "Ineffable" becomes a helpful word when at the frontiers.
I enjoyed your thought about the "balance inside infinity" nonetheless.
Another fun semantic headgame is the plural "infinite universes":
http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=u...0&l=30&o=r
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi