06-09-2017, 10:34 AM
(06-09-2017, 09:14 AM)Bring4th_Jade Wrote: The 75,000 year mark for Earth specifically is when Yahweh came and transferred Mars souls to our planet and genetically altered the ape form so it would be more conducive to learning in the middle of a cycle - as Mars had their cycle interrupted.
Ra says the 75,000 year cycle is the same for all third density experiences. The things you are speaking of - art, early tools - these were likely made by very late second density beings (Or, as someone else mentioned, Maldek souls in their karmic limitation of body complex dexterity). Ra says that without the genetic changes that were caused by Yahweh, "human beings" (third density bodies) wouldn't look too different from their second density counterparts.
Quote:14.3 Questioner: Then what was the second-density form— what did it look like— that became Earth-man in the third density? What did he look like in the second density?
Ra: I am Ra. The difference between second- and third-density bodily forms would in many cases have been more like one to the other. In the case of your planetary sphere the process was interrupted by those who incarnated here from the planetary sphere you call Mars. They were adjusted by genetic changing and, therefore, there was some difference which was of a very noticeable variety rather than the gradual raising of the bipedal forms upon your second-density level to third-density level. This has nothing to do with the so-called placement of the soul. This has only to do with the circumstances of the influx of those from that culture.
Carbon dating etc is pretty fallible, so as far as wanting archeology to specifically correlate with Ra's timeline, there isn't much hope. I mean, humans believe the Moai statues were created within the past 1,000 years - Ra says they were placed by Orion 25,000 years ago - so is it inconsistencies with Ra, or human error? Are these parts of the material really that important to *prove*, to get meaning from the philosophy?
Ra said that the ape form was modified for Maldek beings, roughly 500,000 years ago. But when 3D began, 75,000 years ago, modern human was already there. The genetic changes by Yahweh, at that time, were made for the arrival of Mars beings. I agree art and burial sites may have been made by late 2D entities, as Beriem also said.
For radiocarbon dating, it is not commonly used beyond samples older than 50,000 ago, because carbon-14 is often insufficient. Other modern techniques are used instead, and are well established. For the moai, they can't be dated using this technique because they are made of stone. So the chronological dating of their carvings are pure speculation. Robert Schoch suggests they are much older than what is commonly admitted:
Robert Schoch Wrote:Studying the moai with a geological eye, Schoch was particularly impressed by the varying degrees of weathering and erosion seen on different moai, which could be telltale signs of major discrepancies in their ages. The levels of sedimentation around certain moai also impressed him. Some moai have been buried in up to an estimated six meters (20 feet) of sediment, or more, such that even though they are standing erect, only their chins and heads are above the current ground level. Such high levels of sedimentation could occur quickly, for instance, if there were catastrophic landslides or mudflows, but Schoch could not find any such evidence (and landslides would tend to shift and knock over the tall statues). Rather, to his eye, the sedimentation around certain moai suggests a much more extreme antiquity than most conventional archaeologists and historians believe to be the case.
[...]
Sea levels have risen dramatically since the end of the last ice age, some ten thousand or more years ago, and if the basalt moai were quarried along the coast of Easter Island from areas since inundated by the sea, this could help to date the basalt moai, and is immediately suggestive that they are thousands of years older than conventionally believed to be the case.
The whole and very interesting paper can be read there: http://www.robertschoch.com/articles/sch...oposal.pdf
For those who don't know him, Schoch is a scientist having a PhD in geology and geophysics, who is best known for his alternative yet very rational theories about the Sphinx and the pyramids.