10-28-2010, 12:23 PM
(10-25-2010, 10:01 AM)unity100 Wrote:(10-25-2010, 09:27 AM)Lavazza Wrote: Hey Unity, I'm not so sure about these last points. The logic employed here is just that- and I wouldn't be surprised if logic, especially as employed in third density, is not a logical (pun intended) way to proceed on these matters. I paint myself in a corner by offering this thought as, being in third density also, I cannot hope to make a countering point to your theory and find it more valid.
logic is logic wherever it is. however if you mean the complex concept as a whole, it may depend.
Hey Unity,
I believe you missed the full meaning of what I said here. I did not mean to put emphasis on logic per se, but on logic as it is employed from a limited view point, which is of course, the view point we enjoy here in third density. You may well be completely correct in your logical deductions, but it would surprise me greatly. Not to imply that I have a better way to go about this business, because I don't. Nor do I suggest we stop. I just think it's worthwhile to step back a bit and recognize that we really can't speak absolutely to the mystery that is the Creation. Do you agree?
L&L, ~L