10-25-2010, 10:01 AM
(10-25-2010, 09:27 AM)Lavazza Wrote: Hey Unity, I'm not so sure about these last points. The logic employed here is just that- and I wouldn't be surprised if logic, especially as employed in third density, is not a logical (pun intended) way to proceed on these matters. I paint myself in a corner by offering this thought as, being in third density also, I cannot hope to make a countering point to your theory and find it more valid.
logic is logic wherever it is. however if you mean the complex concept as a whole, it may depend.
Quote:But regardless, here it is anyway: Your idea about there being no hope for a 'one infinite all powerful entity' disregards the possibility that, should such an entity exist, being infinite and all powerful, could if it chose to, forget that it was as such and play a game with itself for fun. This is I think probably much more accurate, although as I mentioned earlier I cannot make a convincing case for it, nor even do I find myself with enough time to gather appropriate Ra quotes. Nevertheless I offer it for yours, and others consideration. I have no vested interest of there being such an entity, in fact Pantheism is more my style. But I'm also not closed to the idea of there being a One Creator, or God. Very probably the truth is somewhere in the middle, or somehow both.
that is not parallel to the issue at hand. the thing is, whether there exists a union of infinite aspects and traits/characters, or, there exists a single, infinite uniform entity that is in the fashion that is being described.
the latter is impossible, since there would be nothing to discover, if the entity was uniform.
the latter is mandatory, because, there has to be things to discover to discover anything, and, if there are infinite things 'an entity' can discover about itself, it means that that entity is comprised of infinite traits/characteristics. making it a harmonized collective of finites.
'both' may be a correct word, going towards infinity.
however the understanding of infinity would be incorrect if that 'single' entity concept is still forced upon it. infinity, to be infinity, needs to be in all states. therefore, it needs to be multiple as well as single, in harmonized fashion.
basically infinity would be a level above the 'sea' that is talked about in some sufist philosophies, and around or above the 'zen' that is described in that philosophy. 'the sea' and the symbol of zen, correlate to each other, in addition.
any kind of 'god', would be below these, as a focus point of intelligent infinity.