How Do STS's View Other Selves?

[anagogy]

Evil is the illusion, good is the underlying truth. Love is that which is non-dualizable.

I would word it slightly differently. I would say good is the reflection of light/love or love/light off the world of form (duality), and evil was the darkness and shadows cast by love/light or light/love when it attempted to do that, because not everything in the realm of duality will reflect light (some will absorb it or block it). Love/light or light/love, in its unmanifest state doesn't reflect off any surfaces, and by extension, doesn't cast any shadows either (since shadows are a product of a centralized light source, and something blocking the reach of that light). But I essentially agree with you.

I think you can cling to wanting to perceive evil in others and yourself, but that will be let go of as one's understanding reaches closer to unity and sees that there was no evil. To take back the example of a child murderer, if you look at a child murderer without feeling love, then you are simply expressing your own blockages and misunderstandings of facets of yourself which this other-self triggered. There is no separation, who the aggressor kills is it's inner-child and the outer victim is an outer-projection of this inner-child through united inter-connection.

I think one can recognize the evil of something, without it necessarily being a blockage. Seeing evil in an act, versus not seeing evil in an act, does not contain the blockage in my opinion, rather, it is the pretending to not see the evil, that I see many 'spiritual people' do, that is the blockage, which is generally a blue ray blockage of not being honest with themselves. It is not about the objective truth of the event, because that is not something we, as 3rd density beings, can know anyway. It's about self recognition and self understanding and self acceptance. Also, please understand I'm not advocating to look at a someone, such as this example of a murderer, and not feel love for them. You can feel love for someone, and yet still recognize an action, as presented, as being of an evil (or predominantly selfish nature) insofar as you know their true thoughts and intent, which is difficult to say the least. This is partially why I brought up the example of my serial killer cat, who has zero compassion, yet I still love her.

I really like the cold/warm analogy because it really illustrates how emotionally charged concepts have warped the issue so completely. So I would say, it is not a blockage that one recognizes something as being warm or cold, but rather it is a blockage to pretend one sees or feels metaphorical warmth when one doesn't (again, I see people do this all the time in the name of spirituality). It is a failure to recognize 'what is', because subjective though our 3rd density perceptions may be, it is still a perfect part of 'what is', so it is a blockage to repress that. One can acknowledge a feeling of warmth or coldness, and yet still understand that at a deeper level it is just a subjective interpretation of the kinetic energy involved. Just don't deny the subjective reality, because it is part of the greater reality.  

So in a cosmic sense, I completely agree there is no evil, or good for that matter, because both are subjective interpretations (like warm and cold) of nondual love/light or light/love. But to deny the illusion of evil and good is as silly, from my vantage point, as going about pretending that cold and warm don't exist, or pain and pleasure, or the rainbow spectrum of colors. The concept has useful and practical manifestation within the context of our illusion. Is seeing color a blockage? I wouldn't say so.  And similarly, recognizing evil (and good) isn't a blockage either. It is a comparison between our conception of wholeness to the action offered in relation to that. The conception of wholeness is part of the duality, but actual oneness is not. The spectrum of behavior between the light and the dark is as important to the nature of our illusion as all these other dichotomies are. I can appreciate and recognize color, and still understand it all comes from the same white light. It's just a mistake, in my opinion, to pretend that color doesn't exist within the context of the illusion.