10-14-2010, 01:44 AM
My refraining from discussing with you, is not due to anything other than your fixation in defending an all powerful, infinite god concept - which you apparently believe in and feel that has to be true - AND while defending it, selectively ignoring, skipping, intentionally repeating, reiterating, or subconsciously evading anything in the posts of the person you are discussing with, or, in the material you strive academic honesty in regard to, if they are detrimental to that belief/perspective.
what results in the end just happens to be a more elaborate, detailed, and advanced type of the situation that ensues when one discusses with someone with fundamentalist religious views - anything that is not beneficial to the support of belief, is subconsciously forgotten, anything that is detrimental to the arguments are consciously skipped, anything that is thought to be relevant is incessantly repeated. i am not saying that you are a fundamentalist religious person. however, the pattern that the person discusses with you, is basically the same.
there is no point in discussing like that. it is not only unfruitful, but also time consuming and wasteful for the participants.
what results in the end just happens to be a more elaborate, detailed, and advanced type of the situation that ensues when one discusses with someone with fundamentalist religious views - anything that is not beneficial to the support of belief, is subconsciously forgotten, anything that is detrimental to the arguments are consciously skipped, anything that is thought to be relevant is incessantly repeated. i am not saying that you are a fundamentalist religious person. however, the pattern that the person discusses with you, is basically the same.
there is no point in discussing like that. it is not only unfruitful, but also time consuming and wasteful for the participants.