08-23-2016, 09:08 AM
(08-22-2016, 07:45 PM)Chandlersdad Wrote:(08-21-2016, 09:36 PM)Eddie Wrote:(08-20-2016, 02:52 PM)Bring4th_Austin Wrote: I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think David still upholds that his Ra source is the same as the one Carla channeled.
I specifically remember hearing David, in one of his audio files, state that the entity he was channeling was not our "Ra", but rather one "Ra-Ta", an Egyptian-Atlantean entity (in other words, one who had experienced Earthly incarnations).
OK, I am back because I kept a bookmark for this specific topic. I just read a document David wrote about the Ra Law of One. While holding my nose because the self-promotion was RELENTLESS, I finished it. One of his claims was that Carla's Ra has decided to return to help humankind (I believe the document is from 2014) and David (with his usual humble persona) claiming that he was now the channel. Perhaps he has received so much flak from this that he recanted later on.
I also watched a YOUTUBE 3 hour lecture by David where he claimed that he understands the Law of One more than anyone else. I kid you not. I assume that includes Jim McCarty, Scott Mandelker and the L/L Research Center. He then goes on to what I consider to be a wild vision of harvest on planet Earth. According to David, those who ascend to 4 Density Earth will need to FIGHT AGAINST the forces of evil still remaining on planet Earth. But not to worry because all 4 D entities will have super powers! So the battle will resemble the greatest superhero movie ever made (again, his words). Frankly, at this point I stopped listening (the first 2 hours were pseudo-science that only David has realized - foolish ignorant mainstream scientists cannot see all the connections that only David has seen. He told the audience that ONLY HE knew this truth and was sharing it in lectures. THIS I can believe). Anyway, David seems to blend his version of science (which seems to include a lot of false equivalencies and conclusions), along with Ra Law of One material that at times does not coincide with what I have learned so far. So he is indeed sending people to study the Law of One, but some of them will have to be deprogrammed from the wild stuff that David is teaching them.
I honestly do not see why David is so popular. Call me old world but I also don't like his crude fraternity boy style jokes either.
NOTE: In case it seems I have a fetish about David, I got myself a new fancy printer. I spent today printing out Carla's speech transcripts, Study Guide and other voluminous material, since I don't like to read very long online. To keep me company, I thought I'd give Davey Wavey a try on YOUTUBE. That is the only reason I would spend that amount of time listening to him.
In my own personal opinion I think you're the one that needs to be deprogrammed.. how about backwards researching his stuff instead of being so judgemental.
I'm trying my best to be patient, but i'm having a hard time with the way you are trying to learn. You ask a question by denouncing what it is that you don't understand, as if what you understand is the only intelligence to be found. Can you write something where it doesn't sound judgemental or like you're looking down at something just because you don't understand it means it's automatically false. You did the same thing with the gay thing, and it's like come on. How much energy do you have to complain?
You say he's talking about psuedo science but then don't cite any of the researchers he cites! What about it was so false? Can you hone in on one thing that seemed so wrong? Instead all of it seems like you feel david is wrong because you don't understand any of what he is saying.
So far just throwing really negative comments, I am not finding any deliberative thought process.
http://www.fractal.org/Life-Science-Tech...ariaev.htm Have you ever read anything on wave genetics or anything on sacred geometry? How about discussing why you think it's so psuedo, with a softer heart. Seriously how do you just insult everything you don't understand. Isn't that the point, third density is not the density of knowing. So how do you proposition yourself to know anything when it is you who is asking the questions!
Now I'm thinking about reading Law of One and everytime Ra says I am Ross. thank you for the laugh.